Cited by 76Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

A review of evidence-based early intervention for behavioural problems in children with autism spectrum disorder: the core components of effective programs, child-focused interventions and comprehensive treatment models

Tonge, Bruce J., Bull, Kerry, Brereton, Avril, Wilson, Rebecca·2014·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews recent evidence and other earlier relevant articles regarding early intervention studies for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). RECENT FINDINGS: There is a well-established body of empirical evidence for the effectiveness of Early Intensive Behavioural Intervention (EIBI) with young children with ASD. The importance of parent skills training, education and positive behaviour support is also a key factor in influencing outcomes. Drug treatment is of short-term benefit for disruptive behaviour but long-term outcome and metabolic side-effects have not been studied. SUMMARY: Few studies have measured the long-term value and effectiveness of early intervention treatments, and currently there are no articles published on effects into adulthood of such treatments. Such research would indicate whether early intervention results in reduced reliance on health services into adulthood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000043

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature on comprehensive intensive intervention mostly reports outcomes measured right after treatment ends, leaving persistence over time largely unclear.

    “However, most studies of comprehensive, intensive intervention report only immediate outcomes at the end of intervention, and the degree to which these outcomes are sustained over time is largely unknown.4–6”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tonge, B. J., Bull, K., Brereton, A., & Wilson, R.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Tonge, Bruce J.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2014-03
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
158-165
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007833018
Cited by
75
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, early intervention, child behavior problems, positive behavior support, pharmacotherapy, disruptive behavior, long-term outcomes, coming of age, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Behavior Therapy, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Antipsychotic Agents, Patient-Centered Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Empirical Research, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review