Cited by 446Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

A randomized controlled trial of Hanen's ‘More Than Words’ in toddlers with early autism symptoms

Open access
Carter, Alice S., Messinger, Daniel S., Stone, Wendy L., Celimli, Seniz, Nahmias, Allison S., Yoder, Paul·2011·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: This randomized controlled trial compared Hanen’s ‘More than Words’ (HMTW), a parent‐implemented intervention, to a ‘business as usual’ control group. Methods: Sixty‐two children (51 boys and 11 girls; M age = 20 months; SD = 2.6) who met criteria for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and their parents participated in the study. The HMTW intervention was provided over 3.5 months. There were three measurement periods: prior to randomization (Time 1) and at 5 and 9 months post enrollment (Times 2 and 3). Children’s communication and parental responsivity were measured at each time point. Children’s object interest, a putative moderator, was measured at Time 1. Results: There were no main effects of the HMTW intervention on either parental responsivity or children’s communication. However, the effects on residualized gains in parental responsivity from Time 1 to both Times 2 and 3 yielded noteworthy effect sizes (Glass’s Δ = .71, .50 respectively). In contrast, there were treatment effects on child communication gains to Time 3 that were moderated by children’s Time 1 object interest. Children with lower levels of Time 1 object interest exhibited facilitated growth in communication; children with higher levels of object interest exhibited growth attenuation. Conclusions: The HMTW intervention showed differential effects on child communication depending on a baseline child factor. HMTW facilitated communication in children with lower levels of Time 1 object interest. Parents of children who evidence higher object interest may require greater support to implement the HMTW strategies, or may require different strategies than those provided by the HMTW curriculum.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This randomized controlled trial found no main effects of Hanen’s ‘More Than Words’ (HMTW) on parental responsivity or toddler communication compared with a ‘business as usual’ control group. However, child communication gains were moderated by baseline object interest: children with lower object interest showed facilitated growth, while those with higher object interest showed attenuated growth.

Key findings

  • In 62 toddlers with ASD symptoms (51 boys, 11 girls; mean age 20 months, SD = 2.6), HMTW did not produce statistically significant main effects on parental responsivity or child communication.
  • Parental responsivity residualized gains from Time 1 to Time 2 and Time 1 to Time 3 had noteworthy effect sizes (Glass’s Δ = .71 and .50, respectively), though these did not reach conventional significance (p = .08 and p = .09).
  • Time 1 object interest moderated treatment effects on child communication from Time 1 to Time 3: children who played with fewer than three toys at Time 1 showed greater gains in initiating joint attention, initiating behavior requests, and weighted intentional communication if randomized to HMTW; children who played with more than five or six toys (depending on outcome) showed lower gains if randomized to HMTW.
  • For parent-reported nonverbal communication, only the higher region of significance was interpretable: parents of children who played with at least six toys at Time 1 reported more limited growth if randomized to HMTW rather than control.
  • Consumer satisfaction was high: mean ratings of 5.48 out of 6 on the group experience questionnaire and 3.46 out of 4 on the group leader experience questionnaire.

Methods

  • Randomized controlled trial comparing HMTW, a parent-implemented intervention delivered over 3.5 months (eight group sessions and three individual family sessions), to a ‘business as usual’ control group. Sixty-two children were randomized (32 HMTW, 30 control); 55 had follow-up data (89% retention), analyzed as ‘partial’ intent to treat.
  • Measurements occurred at Time 1 (pre-randomization), Time 2 (approximately 5.3 months after Time 1), and Time 3 (approximately 9.3 months after Time 1). Outcomes included parental responsivity from the Parent–Child Free Play procedure; child communication from the Early Social Communication Scales (initiating joint attention, initiating behavior requests), Parent–Child Free Play weighted intentional communication, and Parent Interview for Autism–Clinical Version nonverbal communication.
  • Object interest was measured at Time 1 using the Developmental Play Assessment (number of toys with differentiated play). Main analyses used residualized gain scores, independent-sample t-tests, hierarchical linear regression, and empirically derived regions of significance.

Limitations

  • The paper states that group size was not commensurate with Hanen recommendations (mean 3.57 families per session; range 1–10; standard minimum of 8), which may have compromised learning opportunities and social support.
  • Statistical power was constrained for several outcome measures due to child non-compliance, technical problems, and experimenter error; a full intent-to-treat design with imputation was not pursued.
  • The paper notes that conditional effects were exploratory, regions of significance varied by outcome, and replication is essential before using results to select treatments for individual children.
  • The text also makes evident that the Time 1 parental responsivity ICC was relatively low (.46), and the sample was small, limiting precision.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02395.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

5 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Claims the paper makes

0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Abstract

    HMTW treatment effects on child communication gains to Time 3 were moderated by children's Time 1 object interest.

    “In contrast, there were treatment effects on child communication gains to Time 3 that were moderated by children’s Time 1 object interest.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “The HMTW intervention showed differential effects on child communication depending on a baseline child factor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Abstract

    Among children with higher levels of Time 1 object interest, HMTW was associated with attenuated growth in communication.

    “Children with lower levels of Time 1 object interest exhibited facilitated growth in communication; children with higher levels of object interest exhibited growth attenuation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Abstract

    Among children with lower levels of Time 1 object interest, HMTW was associated with facilitated growth in communication.

    “Children with lower levels of Time 1 object interest exhibited facilitated growth in communication; children with higher levels of object interest exhibited growth attenuation.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “HMTW facilitated communication in children with lower levels of Time 1 object interest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The HMTW intervention had no statistically significant main effect on change in parental responsivity from Time 1 to Time 3 (t(1, 35) = 1.8, p = .09).

    “The main effects of the HMTW intervention on change in parental responsivity from Time 1 to Time 2 and from Time 1 to Time 3 did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance, t(1, 31) = 1.8, p = .08 and t(1, 35) = 1.8, p = .09, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There were no effects of HMTW on gains from Time 1 to Time 2.

    “As expected, there were no effects of HMTW on gains from Time 1 to Time 2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 33
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract

    In this RCT of toddlers with early autism symptoms, the HMTW intervention had no main effect on parental responsivity or on children's communication.

    “There were no main effects of the HMTW intervention on either parental responsivity or children’s communication.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract

    HMTW assignment was associated with residualized gains in parental responsivity from Time 1 to Time 2 (Glass's Δ = .71) and from Time 1 to Time 3 (Glass's Δ = .50).

    “However, the effects on residualized gains in parental responsivity from Time 1 to both Times 2 and 3 yielded noteworthy effect sizes (Glass’s Δ = .71, .50 respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The mean rating on the group leader experience questionnaire was 3.46 out of 4.

    “Consumer satisfaction was extremely high, with mean ratings of 5.48 (out of 6) on the group experience questionnaire and 3.46 (out of 4) on the group leader experience questionnaire.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Across treatment groups, children showed a large increase in weighted frequency of intentional communication from Time 1 to Time 3 (d = .77, p < .05).

    “Overall, children’s increases in communication from Time 1 to Time 3 were moderate (IJA d = .43, IBR d = .55), large (weighted frequency of intentional communication, d = .77), and very large (PIA-CV nonverbal communication d = 1.15), ps < .05.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Across treatment groups, children showed a very large increase in PIA-CV nonverbal communication from Time 1 to Time 3 (d = 1.15, p < .05).

    “Overall, children’s increases in communication from Time 1 to Time 3 were moderate (IJA d = .43, IBR d = .55), large (weighted frequency of intentional communication, d = .77), and very large (PIA-CV nonverbal communication d = 1.15), ps < .05.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although no main effects of treatment were observed on child outcomes, exploratory analyses revealed several significant conditional effects.

    “Although no main effects of treatment were observed on child outcomes in the current study, exploratory analyses revealed several significant conditional effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Across treatment groups, children showed a moderate increase in initiating behavioral requests from Time 1 to Time 3 (d = .55, p < .05).

    “Overall, children’s increases in communication from Time 1 to Time 3 were moderate (IJA d = .43, IBR d = .55), large (weighted frequency of intentional communication, d = .77), and very large (PIA-CV nonverbal communication d = 1.15), ps < .05.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Across treatment groups, children showed a moderate increase in initiating joint attention from Time 1 to Time 3 (d = .43, p < .05).

    “Overall, children’s increases in communication from Time 1 to Time 3 were moderate (IJA d = .43, IBR d = .55), large (weighted frequency of intentional communication, d = .77), and very large (PIA-CV nonverbal communication d = 1.15), ps < .05.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Across treatment groups, parents showed a moderate decrease in responsivity from Time 2 to Time 3 (d = −.44, t(38) = −2.4; p = .02).

    “and showed moderate decreases in responsivity during the follow-up period (from Time 2 to Time 3) d = −.44, t(38) = −2.4; p = .02.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For initiating joint attention, initiating behavioral requests, and PCFP weighted frequency of intentional communication, both higher and lower regions of significance were interpretable.

    “In predicting residualized gains in IJA, IBR and PCFP weighted frequency of intentional communication, both higher and lower regions of significance were interpretable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the current study, there were no main effects of treatment on child outcomes immediately after treatment or 5 months after treatment.

    “In the current study, there were no main effects of treatment on child outcomes immediately after the parent-implemented treatment or 5 months after treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although the authors expected joint attention to moderate the effects of HMTW on child outcomes, none of the interactions were statistically significant.

    “Although we had expected joint attention to moderate the effects of the HMTW intervention on child outcomes, none of the interactions were statistically significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Parents rated the HMTW intervention and group leaders extremely favorably.

    “Although the mean fidelity of treatment implementation was high with respect to measured HMTW content and interventionist quality, and parents rated the HMTW intervention and group leaders extremely favorably, the size of the parent groups was not commensurate with Hanen recommendations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Communicative and social deficits are core to ASD and are among the first symptoms observed.

    “Communicative and social deficits are not only core to ASD, but are among the first symptoms observed (Zwaigenbaum et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zwaigenbaum et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Very few intervention studies have focused on the toddler period; the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) is a notable exception with positive efficacy findings.

    “To date, however, very few intervention studies have focused on the toddler period, with positive findings for the efficacy of the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) providing a notable exception (Dawson et al., 2010; Vismara & Rogers, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dawson et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vismara & Rogers, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    There is consensus that parents should be involved in interventions designed for infants and toddlers with ASD.

    “In contrast to interventions for preschool-aged and older children with ASD, there is consensus that parents should be involved in interventions designed for infants and toddlers (Meadan, Ostrosky, Zaghlawan, & Yu, 2009; Zwaigenbaum et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Meadan, Ostrosky, Zaghlawan, & Yu, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zwaigenbaum et al., 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Green et al. noted that the positive effects of treatment observed were limited to the parent-child dyad and did not appear to generalize to interactions with other adults.

    “Green et al. noted, however, that the positive effects of treatment observed were (thus far) limited to the parent–child dyad, and did not appear to generalize to interactions with other adults.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Green et al.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The weighted frequency of intentional communication is more sensitive to change over time than the unweighted variable, and growth in the weighted variable (but not the unweighted variable) predicts later social impairment in younger siblings of children with ASD.

    “Previous research has indicated that the weighted variable is more sensitive to change over time than the unweighted variable and that growth in the weighted variable (but not the unweighted variable) was predictive of later social impairment in younger siblings of children with ASD (Yoder, Stone, Walden, & Malesa, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yoder, Stone, Walden, & Malesa, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The ICCs on proportion of codable intervals with a parental response were .46 at Time 1, .84 at Time 2, and .75 at Time 3.

    “The ICCs on proportion of codable intervals with a parental response were .46 at Time 1, .84 at Time 2, and .75 at Time 3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The original PIA demonstrated strong psychometric properties for children between 20 months and 5 years, 11 months.

    “The original PIA (Stone & Hogan, 1993) demonstrated strong psychometric properties for children between 20 months and 5 years, 11 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stone & Hogan, 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The number of participants with valid outcome data differs across measures, influencing power.

    “Owing to child non-compliance, technical problems, and human error, the number of participants with valid outcome data differs across the measures, influencing power (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The conditional effects were exploratory in nature.

    “These conditional effects were exploratory in nature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The ICCs for weighted triadic communication were .95, .97, and .99 for Times 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

    “The ICCs for weighted triadic communication were based on blind, independent codings of a random selection of approximately 20% of the sessions at each time period and were .95, .97, and .99 for Times 1, 2, and 3, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Coding for all videotaped procedures was completed by coders who were blind to treatment group.

    “Coding for all videotaped procedures was completed by coders who were blind to treatment group using software that enables computer control of digital recordings (ProcoderDV; Tapp & Walden, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is possible that the current sample's limited joint attention skills, which were sampled only in the ESCS, constrained this potential moderator's variability.

    “Thus, it is possible that the current sample’s limited joint attention skills, which were sampled only in the ESCS, constrained this potential moderator’s variability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Children who entered the study with more limited object interest appear to have benefited, while children with greater object interest showed attenuated growth.

    “That is, children who entered the study with more limited object interest appear to have benefited, while children with greater object interest showed attenuated growth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Abstract

    All participants with pre-treatment data and data from at least one follow-up period were included in analyses, irrespective of HMTW treatment attendance.

    “All participants with pre-treatment data and data from at least one of the follow-up periods were included in analyses, irrespective of HMTW treatment attendance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These conditional effects indicated that the HMTW intervention was facilitative of communication for some children, but attenuated growth in communication for others.

    “These effects indicated that the HMTW intervention was facilitative of communication for some children, but attenuated growth in communication for others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    No statistically significant main effects of site or site-by-treatment interactions were observed for any of the outcome variables (all ps > .20).

    “No statistically significant main effects of site or siteby-treatment interactions were observed for any of the outcome variables (all ps > .20).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    The prior HMTW case series reported a range of positive outcomes for children, and the quasi-experimental study reported positive gains in observed parenting behaviors and parents' reports of the number of words children used.

    “The case series reported a range of positive outcomes for children and the quasi-experimental study reported positive gains in observed parenting behaviors and parents’ reports of the number of words children used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Girolametto, Sussman, & Weitzman, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McConachie, Randle, Hammal, & Le Couteur, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Interobserver reliability was estimated through blind, independent codings of a random selection of approximately 20% of sessions at each time period.

    “Interobserver reliability was estimated through blind, independent codings of a random selection of approximately 20% of the sessions at each time period.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Interobserver reliability for differentiated play at Time 1 was ICC = .87.

    “Interobserver reliability was estimated through blind, independent codings of a random selection of approximately 20% of the sessions at Time 1 (ICC = .87).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    There were no differences between the HMTW and 'business as usual' control groups on sociodemographic characteristics or on any Time 1 measures of the experimental or clinical child variables (all ps > .10).

    “There were no differences between the HMTW and ‘business as usual’ groups on sociodemographic characteristics or on any Time 1 measures of the experimental or clinical child variables (all ps > .10) (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The treatment that facilitated linguistic communication for children with low object interest also effectively taught object play skills; the contrasting treatment did not teach object play (McDuffie, Lieberman, & Yoder, in press).

    “The treatment that facilitated linguistic communication for children with low object interest also effectively taught object play skills; the contrasting treatment did not teach object play (McDuffie, Lieberman, & Yoder, in press).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McDuffie, Lieberman, & Yoder, in press

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Abstract

    Families were randomized within each site using software with a random number generator to assign children to the HMTW intervention or control group.

    “Families were randomized within each site using software that utilized a random number generator to assign children to the intervention or control group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Green et al. (2010) found no main effects of a parent-mediated communication-focused treatment on autism severity, clinical language measures, or teacher ratings of adaptive communication.

    “A second recent study also assessed a parent-mediated communication-focused treatment in preschool-aged children with autism (Green et al., 2010), and found no main effects of the treatment on autism severity, clinical language measures, or teacher ratings of adaptive communication.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Green et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Green et al. found a medium effect size of the intervention on observed child social communication and on parent-reported child communication.

    “There was, however, a medium effect size of the intervention on observed child social communication, similar to the behaviors coded in the current study as well as on parent-reported child communication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Green et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In previous work in which initiating joint attention did moderate the effect of treatment on outcome (Yoder & Stone, 2006a), initiating joint attention was assessed across two contexts and the children were somewhat older.

    “In previous work in which IJA did moderate the effect of treatment on outcome (Yoder & Stone, 2006a), IJA was assessed across two contexts and the children were somewhat older.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yoder & Stone, 2006a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The intra-class correlation coefficients for number of IJA and IBR were .93 and .68 at Time 1, .95 and .96 at Time 2, and .95 and .99 at Time 3.

    “The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for number of IJA and IBR were .93 and .68 at Time 1, .95 and .96 at Time 2, and .95 and .99 at Time 3, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Across sites, HMTW was implemented with 88% (SD = 4.7) of intended elements present in group sessions and 89.9% (SD = 7.9) of intended elements in individual sessions.

    “Across sites, HMTW was implemented with 88% (SD = 4.7) of intended elements present in the group sessions and 89.9% (SD = 7.9) of intended elements in the individual sessions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Object interest is important to responsivity-based treatments because teaching episodes tend to occur in object-oriented joint action routines and because providing access to objects contingent on child communication is frequently used as a functional reward.

    “Object interest is important to responsivity-based treatments because teaching episodes tend to occur in object-oriented joint action routines and because providing access to objects contingent on child communication is frequently used as a functional reward.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The presence of moderate to large effect sizes for the parental responsivity outcome and the child outcome moderation effects meet or exceed the usual benchmark of .50 for determining clinically meaningful effects.

    “The metric that supports the clinical significance of these findings is the presence of moderate to large effect sizes for the parental responsivity outcome and the child outcome moderation effects, which meet or exceed the usual benchmark of .50 for determining clinically meaningful effects (Hill, Bloom, Black, & Lipsey, 2008; Wolf, 1986).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hill, Bloom, Black, & Lipsey, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wolf, 1986

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Analyses documented pre-treatment equivalence on measures of child, family and non-project interventions, along with a lack of differential attrition across groups, raising confidence in internal validity.

    “Finally, analyses documenting pre-treatment equivalence on measures of child, family and non-project interventions, along with a lack of differential attrition across the HMTW intervention and ‘business as usual’ control groups, raise confidence in the internal validity of the study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Due to the extent of missing data, a full intent to treat design with imputation was not pursued.

    “In addition, although overall study attrition was low and there was no evidence of differential attrition across the treatment and control groups, statistical power was constrained for several outcome measures due to child non-compliance, technical problems, and experimenter error; due to the extent of missing data a full intent to treat design with imputation was not pursued.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The use of an experimental design and 'partial' intent to treat analyses are strengths of this study.

    “The use of an experimental design and ‘partial’ intent to treat analyses are strengths of this study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Some children showed clear gains in communication that were associated with being randomized to the intervention while others showed attenuation in communication growth.

    “However, some children showed clear gains in communication that were associated with being randomized to the intervention while others showed attenuation in communication growth.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Children with ASD who have limited object interest may be particularly well suited to the HMTW approach.

    “Children with ASD who have limited object interest may be particularly well suited to the HMTW approach, which emphasizes teaching parents to show their child what is interesting about toys and to prompt, wait for, and respond to requests.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Parental sensitivity training resulted in attenuated growth on parental sensitivity and attenuated reduction on child aggression in certain subgroups in a study by Stolk et al. (2008).

    “For example, parental sensitivity training (a part of which is responsivity training) resulted in attenuated growth on parental sensitivity and attenuated reduction on child aggression in certain subgroups of participants in a study by Stolk et al. (2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stolk et al. (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The non-commensurate parent group size may have compromised the potential learning opportunities and social supports that emerge in group sessions with a larger number of parent participants.

    “This circumstance may have compromised the potential learning opportunities and social supports that emerge in group sessions with a larger number of parent participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although nonsignificant effects can occur due to low within-site sample size, the findings of this randomized controlled trial are compatible with the hypothesis that the current findings are generalizable to a relatively broad range of settings in the United States.

    “Although nonsignificant effects can occur due to low within-site sample size, the findings of this randomized controlled trial of the HMTW intervention are compatible with the hypothesis that the current findings are generalizable to a relatively broad range of settings in the United States.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    An additional methodological strength is the multi-method assessment of child communication that was employed.

    “An additional methodological strength is the multi-method assessment of child communication that was employed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The majority of assessors and all observational coding of children's behavior were blind to treatment condition.

    “Further, the majority of assessors and all observational coding of children’s behavior were blind to treatment condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    This study measured communication during parent-child interactions, examiner-child interactions, and via parental report.

    “This study measured communication during parent–child interactions, examiner–child interactions, and via parental report.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of overall treatment effects on child outcomes may be due to the relatively low intensity of the HMTW intervention, or to non-optimal implementation due to smaller than recommended group size.

    “The lack of overall treatment effects on child outcomes may be due to the relatively low intensity of the HMTW intervention, or to the non-optimal implementation due to smaller than recommended group size.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The HMTW intervention is relatively low intensity.
54 of 54
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Parent involvement can capitalize on teachable moments as they occur, provide learning opportunities during naturally occurring routines, and facilitate the generalization of child learning across contexts.

    “Specifically, there is recognition that parent involvement can capitalize on teachable moments as they occur, provide learning opportunities during naturally occurring routines, and facilitate the generalization of child learning across contexts.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Parent-mediated intervention has the potential to be relatively inexpensive and to increase parents' sense of efficacy and empowerment.

    “Additionally, parent-mediated intervention has the potential to be relatively inexpensive and to increase parents’ sense of efficacy and empowerment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Children with ASD are unlikely to benefit unless maintenance of enhanced parenting practices occurs.

    “In addition, measuring the endurance of such effects several months after treatment ends is important because children with ASD are unlikely to benefit unless such maintenance of enhanced parenting practices occurs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The HMTW intervention is relatively low intensity.

    “The lack of overall treatment effects on child outcomes may be due to the relatively low intensity of the HMTW intervention, or to the non-optimal implementation due to smaller than recommended group size.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value: t(29) = −3.39, p = .003

    Minor

    The paper reports p = .003 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .002 (two-tailed). The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p = .003 · recomputed p = .002

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upt(29) = -3.39reported p = .003 · recomputed p = .002

    “t(29) = −3.39, p = .003”

  • Consistentt(32) = 2.88reported p = .007 · recomputed p = .007

    “t(32) = 2.88, p = .007”

  • Consistentt(45) = -3.38reported p = .002 · recomputed p = .002

    “t(45) = −3.38, p = .002”

  • Consistentt(45) = -3.41reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .001

    “t(45) = −3.41, p < .01”

  • Consistentt(42) = -2.39reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .021

    “t(42) = −2.39, p = .02”

5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Consumer-satisfaction questionnaires have their scales reversed

    Minor

    The survey description assigns the 1-6 scale to questions about the group leader and the 1-4 scale to questions about group climate. The results assign those scales to group experience and group leader experience, respectively.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. McDuffie A., Object interest in young children with autism spectrum disorders. A randomized treatment comparison, Autism
  2. Mundy P., 2003, A manual for the abridged Early Social Communication Scales (ESCS)
  3. Sparrow S., 2005, Vineland‐II: Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Survey forms manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, A. S., Messinger, D. S., Stone, W. L., Celimli, S., Nahmias, A. S., & Yoder, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-22
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
741-752
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2112804906
Cited by
446
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
15.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks (AS1718)
  • Autism Research Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, toddlers, parent-mediated intervention, children's communication, parental responsiveness, moderation, early intervention
MeSH terms
Attention, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Combined Modality Therapy, Communication, Education, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Infant, Language Development Disorders, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Play and Playthings, Psychotherapy, Group, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review