The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Persistent DNA damage rewires lipid metabolism and promotes histone hyperacetylation via MYS-1/Tip60
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1126/sciadv.abl6083 · Paper page
Abstract
Nuclear DNA damage is intricately linked to cellular metabolism. However, the underlying mechanisms and full range of metabolic alterations that occur in response to persistent DNA damage are not well understood. Here, we use a DNA repair-deficient model of ERCC1-XPF in Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) , that accumulates physiologically relevant, endogenous DNA damage, to gain molecular insights on how persistent genotoxic stress drives biological aging. Using an integrated multi-omic approach, we discover that persistent genotoxic stress rewires lipid metabolism. In particular, nuclear DNA damage promotes mitochondrial β-oxidation and leads to a global loss of fat depots. This metabolic shift to β-oxidation generates acetyl-CoA and drives histone hyperacetylation. Concomitantly, we observe an associated change in gene expression of immune-effector and cytochrome (CYP) genes. We identify MYS-1, the ortholog of mammalian histone acetyltransferase TIP60, as a critical regulator of this metabolic-epigenetic axis. Moreover, we show that in response to persistent DNA damage, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), especially arachidonic acid (AA) and AA-related lipid mediators are elevated. This elevation of PUFA species requires mys-1 /Tip60. Together, these findings reveal that persistent nuclear DNA damage alters the metabolic-epigenetic axis to drive an immune-like response that can promote age-associated decline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process
Schumacher, B., Pothof, J., Vijg, J., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03307-7 · Cited by 907
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 89
- 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012239 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aao4426 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aau3879 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03468-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aaw0726 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature05456 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/dmm.024711 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/23809000.2017.1300507 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.33112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1200/JCO.19.01226 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41598-020-57506-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature19329 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41514-019-0040-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.08.011 · DOI
- 10.1038/npjamd.2016.22 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.00293-08 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-6448-9_19 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exger.2015.01.045 · DOI
- 10.1111/acel.13094 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.redox.2018.06.005 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb3071 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1182/blood-2011-08-373639 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.119.302919 · DOI
- 10.15252/msb.20178124 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s13059-020-02015-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1162011 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11745-004-1329-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00441-019-03036-4 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2121-11-96 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-19754-1 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0506234102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.12.022 · DOI
- 10.1093/jn/135.6.1557S · DOI
- 10.1038/s12276-020-00504-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.040 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature22405 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1164097 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/epi.4.6.9767 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.01476-09 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.154 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01077-2 · DOI
- 10.1096/fj.12-227108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrn3427 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00173-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb05964.x · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.embor.embor941 · DOI
- 10.1155/2011/371832 · DOI
- 10.1194/jlr.M047357 · DOI
- 10.1111/jgs.13608 · DOI
- 10.1503/cmaj.1031527 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12603-017-0971-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature21686 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2020.06.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.028 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-12640-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.010 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14362 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature08085 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncb1975 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.02.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.01.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tig.2014.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1111/acel.12064 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.09.004 · DOI
- 10.18632/aging.100275 · DOI
- 10.3164/jcbn.12-88 · DOI
- 10.1111/acel.12651 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318249f6a9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.01.013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.019 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151409 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004663 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005970 · DOI
- 10.21769/BioProtoc.3819 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac60119a033 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.abb2529 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13072-016-0097-x · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.1621 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00216-016-9448-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2014.12.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.044 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamsanathan, S., Anthonymuthu, T., Mullett, S. J., Wendell, S. G., Han, S., Shinglot, H., Siefken, E., Sims, A., Sen, P., Pepper, H. L., Snyder, N. W., Bayir, H., Kagan, V., & Gurkar, A. U.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- National Institute on Aging (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gurkar, Aditi U.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science Advances
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-06-24
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- eabl6083-eabl6083
- ISSN
- 2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8849393
- OpenAlex
- W4213004890
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1s10od023402-01a1, HL114453, AI068021, NS061817, P40OD010440)
- National Institute on Aging (R00AG049126, ZIAAG000679)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL114453)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA165065, R01CA243142, P30CA047904)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM132261, R01GM113908)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI068021, U01AI156924, U01AI156923, R01AI145406)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS061817, R37NS061817, R01NS076511)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Keywords
- DNA damage, lipid metabolism, histone hyperacetylation, Tip60, histone acetyltransferase, mitochondrial beta-oxidation, acetyl-CoA, aging, Caenorhabditis elegans, fat depots, arachidonic acid, polyunsaturated fatty acids, lipid mediators
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Histones, Caenorhabditis elegans, Lipid Metabolism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review