Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling

Open access
Barolo, Scott, Posakony, James W.·2002·Genes & Development

Abstract

Seven major cell–cell signaling pathways—Wnt, TGF, Hedgehog (Hh), receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), nuclear receptor, Jak/STAT, and Notch—control the vast majority of cell fate decisions during the development of bilaterian animals (Gerhart 1999). Each pathway is used repeatedly during the development of a given organism, activating different subsets of target genes in different developmental contexts. These seven pathways are strikingly diverse in both their complexity and the biochemical mechanism of signal transduction, ranging from direct transcriptional regulation by the nuclear receptor proteins to the extended protein phosphorylation cascades characteristic of RTK pathways. Nevertheless, the primary consequence of signaling is the same: activation of specific target genes by signal-regulated transcription factors. Recent work has revealed several surprising and fundamental commonalities in the transcriptional mechanisms by which these pathways control the expression of their target genes. In this review, we discuss transcriptional regulation by developmental cell signaling pathways, and suggest that three functional properties—activator insufficiency, cooperative activation, and default repression—are shared among the major pathways. Together, these three “habits” allow signaling pathways to strongly activate target genes in their proper context, while preventing their expression in all other cells. Such strict control over target gene expression explains an extraordinary feature of developmental cell signaling: the capacity of a single pathway to elicit a large variety of gene expression patterns, and hence to control the specification of a large variety of cell fates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.976502

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 104

  1. 10.1093/emboj/20.13.3298 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/386735a0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1101/gad.10.16.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Antoniewski, 1996, Direct repeats bind the EcR/USP receptor and mediate ecdysteroid responses in Drosophila melanogaster., Mol. Cell. Biol., 16, 2977, 10.1128/MCB.16.6.2977 · DOI
  5. Aranda, 2001, Nuclear hormone receptors and gene expression., Physiol. Rev., 81, 1269, 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1269 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1101/gad.9.21.2609 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bang, 1991, Hairless is required for the development of adult sensory organ precursor cells in Drosophila., Development, 111, 89, 10.1242/dev.111.1.89 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00198-7 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/383344a0 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1101/gad.11.18.2359 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/nar/29.7.1410 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1101/gad.7.12a.2418 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/26982 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Certel, 2000, Restricted patterning of vestigial expression in Drosophila wing imaginal discs requires synergistic activation by both Mad and the drifter POU domain transcription factor., Development, 127, 3173, 10.1242/dev.127.14.3173 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/377454a0 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9691 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00130-0 · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00130-0
  18. Danesch, 1987, Glucocorticoid induction of the rat tryptophan oxygenase gene is mediated by two widely separated glucocorticoid-responsive elements., EMBO J., 6, 625, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04800.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0253 · DOI
  20. DasGupta, 1999, Multiple roles for activated LEF/TCF transcription complexes during hair follicle development and differentiation., Development, 126, 4557, 10.1242/dev.126.20.4557 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Davidson E.H. (2001) Genomic regulatory systems—Development and evolution. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA).
  22. 10.1093/emboj/16.8.2014 · DOI
  23. 10.1101/gad.12.14.2153 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00106-9 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00044-0 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1266/jjg.70.505 · DOI
  27. Gabay, 1996, EGF receptor signaling induces pointed P1 transcription and inactivates Yan protein in the Drosophila embryonic ventral ectoderm., Development, 122, 3355, 10.1242/dev.122.11.3355 · DOI
  28. Galang, 1994, Oncogenic Ras can induce transcriptional activation through a variety of promoter elements, including tandem c-Ets-2 binding sites., Oncogene, 9, 2913
  29. Gallet, 2000, Cubitus interruptus-independent transduction of the Hedgehog signal in Drosophila., Development, 127, 5509, 10.1242/dev.127.24.5509 · DOI
  30. Garcia-Bellido, 1975, Genetic control of wing disc development in Drosophila., CIBA Found. Symp., 29, 161
  31. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199910)60:4<226::AID-TERA7>3.0.CO;2-W · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9926(199910)60:4<226::aid-tera7>3.0.co;2-w
  32. 10.1073/pnas.061437798 · DOI
  33. 10.1101/gad.9.8.995 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203721 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80278-0 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1126/science.1058312 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1101/gad.12.24.3900 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00105-7 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/emboj/20.20.5725 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/embo-reports/kvd012 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/emboj/19.8.1839 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Hepker, 1999, Cubitus interruptus is necessary but not sufficient for direct activation of a wing-specific decapentaplegic enhancer., Development, 126, 3669, 10.1242/dev.126.16.3669 · DOI
  43. 10.1101/gad.7.2.173 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Hidalgo, 1990, Cell patterning in the Drosophila segment: Spatial regulation of the segment polarity gene patched., Development, 110, 291, 10.1242/dev.110.1.291 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1128/MCB.20.17.6612-6625.2000 · DOI
  46. Hsieh, 1996, Truncated mammalian Notch1 activates CBF1/RBPJκ-repressed genes by a mechanism resembling that of Epstein-Barr virus EBNA2., Mol. Cell. Biol., 16, 952, 10.1128/MCB.16.3.952 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1101/gad.12.14.2114 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Jiménez, 2000, Relief of gene repression by torso RTK signaling: Role of capicua in Drosophila terminal and dorsoventral patterning., Genes & Dev., 14, 224, 10.1101/gad.14.2.224 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81118-6 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1101/gad.12.15.2269 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Kasai, 1998, Specification of the Drosophila CNS midline cell lineage: Direct control of single-minded transcription by dorsal/ventral patterning genes., Gene Expr., 7, 171
  52. 10.1038/382133a0 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0397 · DOI
  54. Knirr, 1999, The role of the NK-homeobox gene slouch (S59) in somatic muscle patterning., Development, 126, 4525, 10.1242/dev.126.20.4525 · DOI
  55. 10.1101/gad.908801 · DOI
  56. 10.1126/science.275.5307.1784 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1074/jbc.M001114200 · DOI
  58. Lai, 2000, The Enhancer of split Complex of Drosophila includes four Notch-regulated members of the Bearded gene family., Development, 127, 3441, 10.1242/dev.127.16.3441 · DOI
  59. 10.1101/gad.9.21.2598 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/S0092-8674(88)80010-2 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1101/gad.13.17.2196 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0285 · DOI
  63. Martin-Blanco, 1998, Regulatory control of signal transduction during morphogenesis in Drosophila., Int. J. Dev. Biol., 42, 363
  64. 10.1093/emboj/19.8.1745 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Matsuno, 1997, Suppressor of Hairless-independent events in Notch signaling imply novel pathway elements., Development, 124, 4265, 10.1242/dev.124.21.4265 · DOI
  66. 10.1006/dbio.1997.8797 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80592-9 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 2001, An absolute requirement for Cubitus interruptus in Hedgehog signaling., Development, 128, 733, 10.1242/dev.128.5.733 · DOI
  69. Morel, 2000, Repression by Suppressor of hairless and activation by Notch are required to define a single row of single-minded expressing cells in the Drosophila embryo., Genes & Dev., 14, 377, 10.1101/gad.14.3.377 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00224-X · DOI
  71. Müller, 2000, The repressor and activator forms of Cubitus interruptus control Hedgehog target genes through common generic gli-binding sites., Development, 127, 2999, 10.1242/dev.127.14.2999 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00319-1 · DOI
  73. 10.1093/emboj/20.23.6836 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90292-7 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9324 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1126/science.2831625 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1038/35001602 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90580-0 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1128/MCB.21.22.7761-7774.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Paroush, 1997, Torso signalling regulates terminal patterning in Drosophila by antagonising Groucho-mediated repression., Development, 124, 3827, 10.1242/dev.124.19.3827 · DOI
  81. 10.1074/jbc.273.46.30081 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90105-8 · DOI
  83. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203525 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90006-3 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81924-8 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Roose, 1999, TCF transcription factors: Molecular switches in carcinogenesis., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1424, M23
  87. 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9358 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1101/gad.8.11.1247 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1038/332087a0 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Singson A. (1995) “Transcriptional activation by proneural proteins in Drosophila adult peripheral nervous system development.” Ph.D. thesis (University of California San Diego, La Jolla).
  91. 10.1101/gad.8.17.2058 · DOI
  92. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0117 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1126/science.1064050 · DOI
  94. 10.1101/gad.12.13.2022 · DOI
  95. 10.1101/gad.896501 · DOI
  96. Van Doren, 1991, The Drosophila extramacrochaetae protein antagonizes sequence-specific DNA binding by daughterless/achaete–scute protein complexes., Development, 113, 245, 10.1242/dev.113.1.245 · DOI · Paper page
  97. 10.1074/jbc.274.29.20489 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Wang, 1997, Only a subset of the binary cell fate decisions mediated by Numb/Notch signaling in Drosophila sensory organ lineage requires Suppressor of Hairless., Development, 124, 4435, 10.1242/dev.124.22.4435 · doi:10.1242/dev.124.22.4435
  99. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00107-0 · DOI
  100. 10.1101/gad.12.15.2354 · DOI
  101. Yang, 1998, A role for CREB binding protein and p300 transcriptional coactivators in Ets-1 transactivation functions., Mol. Cell. Biol., 18, 2218, 10.1128/MCB.18.4.2218 · DOI
  102. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80061-1 · DOI · Paper page
  103. Zenke, 1986, Multiple sequence motifs are involved in SV40 enhancer function., EMBO J., 5, 387, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04224.x · DOI · Paper page
  104. 10.1073/pnas.96.26.14807 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 468

Metadata

Authors
Barolo, S., & Posakony, J. W.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2002-05-15
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1167-1181
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2099105062
Cited by
468
References
7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.976502
The paper
Barolo, S., & Posakony, J. W. (2002). Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.976502

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.