PreprintCited by 12Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and Navigation

Sleep enhances knowledge of routes and regions in spatial environments

Open access
Noack, Hannes, Schick, Wiebke, Mallot, Hanspeter, Born, Jan·2017·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Sleep is thought to preferentially consolidate hippocampus-dependent memory, and as such, spatial navigation. Here, we investigated the effects of sleep on route knowledge and explicit and implicit semantic regions in a virtual environment. Sleep, compared with wakefulness, improved route knowledge and also enhanced awareness of the semantic regionalization within the environment, whereas signs of implicit regionalization remained unchanged. Results support the view that sleep specifically enhances explicit aspects of memory, also in the spatial domain. Enhanced region knowledge after sleep suggests that consolidation during sleep goes along with the formation of more abstract schema-like representations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.043984.116

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rodents and humans, sleep enhances gist extraction from memory, HPC spatial representations, and explicit knowledge of regions in space.

    “In rodents and humans, sleep has been found to enhance gist extraction from memory 89 , HPC spatial representations 101 and explicit knowledge of regions in space 29 -mechanisms that have been attributed to schema learning 22,63 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

  • Individuals prefer to take routes that cross fewer semantic regions, even if they are the same length as routes that contain more regions.

    “Specifically, individuals prefer to take routes that cross fewer semantic regions, even if they are the same length as routes that contain more regions 29 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

  • Consolidation mechanisms, such as sleep, seem to facilitate the explicit knowledge and retrieval of semantic regions and their boundaries.

    “Consolidation mechanisms, such as sleep, seem to facilitate the explicit knowledge and retrieval of semantic regions and their boundaries 29 .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

  • Representations of navigation plans, the regionalization of physical environments and the neural representations of physical environments are all typically hierarchical, whereby a high-level structure encompasses multiple mid-level or low-level features.

    “Representations of navigation plans 159 , the regionalization of physical environments and the neural representations of physical environments 29,160 are all typically hierarchical -whereby a high-level structure encompasses multiple mid-level or low-level features.”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

  • Findings from spatial cognition studies in humans show that semantic knowledge and language cues exert a powerful influence on human spatial judgements and may contribute to spatial schemas.

    “As mentioned in the section on regionalization of space, findings from spatial cognition studies in humans show that semantic knowledge and language cues exert a powerful influence on human spatial judgements 29,138 and may contribute to spatial schemas.”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [29]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noack, H., Schick, W., Mallot, H., & Born, J.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Noack, Hannes
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2017-02-15
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
140-144
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2589082581
Cited by
12
References
40
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TR-SFB 654)
  • Landesgraduiertenfoerderung of the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Württemberg
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
sleep, memory consolidation, spatial navigation, route knowledge, semantic regions, declarative memory, implicit memory, hippocampal-dependent memory, virtual worlds
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sleep, User-Computer Interface, Wakefulness, Knowledge, Young Adult, Spatial Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review