Cited by 89Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and Navigation

A brief nap is beneficial for human route-learning: The role of navigation experience and EEG spectral power.

Open access
Wamsley, Erin J., Tucker, Matthew A., Payne, Jessica D., Stickgold, Robert·2010·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Here, we examined the effect of a daytime nap on changes in virtual maze performance across a single day. Participants either took a short nap or remained awake following training on a virtual maze task. Post-training sleep provided a clear performance benefit at later retest, but only for those participants with prior experience navigating in a three-dimensional (3D) environment. Performance improvements in experienced players were correlated with delta-rich stage 2 sleep. Complementing observations that learning-related brain activity is reiterated during post-navigation NREM sleep in rodents, the present data demonstrate that NREM sleep confers a performance advantage for spatial memory in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.1828310

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior knowledge enhances sleep-associated consolidation, such that schema-conformant memories are strengthened during sleep to a greater extent than non-conformant memories.

    “Interestingly, prior knowledge also enhances sleep-associated consolidation, such that schema-conformant memories are strengthened during sleep to a greater extent than non-conformant memories [32–34].”

    From Sleep bolsters schematically incongruent memories (2022) · cites this paper as [33]

    The paper’s account of maze-performance results (indexed under Abstract; page not provided) reports a sleep benefit for experienced game players but not novices, supporting a limited link between prior experience and sleep-associated retention. It does not compare schema-conformant with non-conformant memories: the comparison is between participants with different game experience, and the authors describe the nap chiefly as stabilizing route memory. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies reporting enhanced overnight memory gains for schema-conformant information have used very different memory paradigms to the current study, including melodic or spatial navigation tasks.

    “Along these lines, it is worth noting that previous studies reporting enhanced overnight memory gains for schema-conformant information have used very different memory paradigms to the current study, which include melodic [32] or spatial navigation tasks [33].”

    From Sleep bolsters schematically incongruent memories (2022) · cites this paper as [33]

    The paper describes a spatial-navigation task and reports that sleep benefited route memory in participants experienced with 3D navigation (Abstract; page not provided). But its experiment tested a daytime nap, not overnight gains, and it did not establish that the learned information was schema-conformant. The sleep benefit was generally stabilization rather than improvement, except when the nap was rich in delta activity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wamsley, E. J., Tucker, M. A., Payne, J. D., & Stickgold, R.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2010-06-25
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
332-336
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2113014142
Cited by
89
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH T32)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL07901-10, T32HL007901)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH048832)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
daytime napping, route learning, spatial memory, NREM sleep, stage 2 sleep, delta power, sleep-dependent memory consolidation
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Sleep Stages, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior, Spectrum Analysis, User-Computer Interface, Maze Learning, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review