Cited by 528Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Lesions of the dorsal hippocampal formation interfere with background but not foreground contextual fear conditioning.

Open access
Phillips, R G, LeDoux, J E·1994·Learning & Memory

Abstract

The effects of hippocampal lesions on the conditioning of fear responses (freezing responses) to contextual stimuli (static, continuously present stimuli) were examined in three conditioning paradigms: forward pairing of a phasic tone conditioned stimulus (CS) with a footshock unconditioned stimulus (US), unpaired presentations of the CS and US, or presentations of the US alone. All three procedures resulted in the acquisition of conditioned freezing to contextual stimuli. Lesions of the dorsal hippocampus prevented the acquisition of contextual conditioning in the Paired procedure, as reported previously, but not in the Unpaired or US Alone procedures. In the Paired procedure, static contextual cues occur in the background, with the phasic tone CS being the primary stimulus that enters into the association with the US. However, in the other two procedures, where there is no phasic CS, the primary associations with the US involve static contextual stimuli, which are therefore in the foreground. We refer to these types of contextual conditioning as background and foreground contextual conditioning, respectively, and argue that the hippocampus is only involved in background contextual conditioning. These results have implications for understanding both fear conditioning and hippocampal function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.1.1.34

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
1994
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
34-44
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2340064264
Cited by
528
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9209646)
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh000956-07)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (K02MH00956)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R37 MH38774, K02-MH00956, R37MH038774)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
dorsal hippocampus, hippocampal lesions, contextual fear conditioning, freezing behavior, hippocampal function
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Fear, Hippocampus, Male, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review