The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Joining and splitting the quantum states of photons
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For three photons, an additional collective phase is required to describe the photons' scattering behaviour.
“For three photons for example, an additional collective phase is required to describe the photons' scattering behaviour [146][147][148].”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [147]
Section IV discusses three-photon entangled states in relation to quantum-state joining, not a collective phase needed to describe scattering. A search of the indexed copy for collective phase and three-photon scattering found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Branning, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02054 · Cited by 992
Linear optical controlled-NOT gate in the coincidence basis
Ralph, T. C., Langford, N. K., Bell, T. B., & White, A. G. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.062324 · Cited by 346
Experimental controlled-NOT logic gate for single photons in the coincidence basis
Pittman, T. B., Fitch, M. J., Jacobs, B. C., & Franson, J. D. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.032316 · Cited by 328
Realization of a Photonic Controlled-NOT Gate Sufficient for Quantum Computation
Gasparoni, S., Pan, J.-W., Walther, P., Rudolph, T., & Zeilinger, A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.020504 · Cited by 315
Nagali, E., Sansoni, L., Marrucci, L., Santamato, E., & Sciarrino, F. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.052317 · Cited by 80
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1038/35005001 · DOI · Paper page
- A. V. Sergienko, 2006, Quantum Communications and Cryptography, 10.1201/9781420026603 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08812 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2009.229 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2011.354 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.260501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphys607 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys1150 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.160401 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2010.215 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.073602 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphys1603 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2011.330 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys1996 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2012.243 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2013.107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.062320 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature03064 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature07127 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1367-2630/8/3/035 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2013.169 · DOI
- 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.030501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.037903 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.024308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.012312 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00948-4 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022325 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.033806 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11361 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Passaro, E., Vitelli, C., Spagnolo, N., Sciarrino, F., Santamato, E., & Marrucci, L.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-12-16
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
