CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,963

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Case research in operations management

Voss, Chris, Tsikriktsis, Nikos, Frohlich, Mark·2002·International Journal of Operations & Production Management
DOI 10.1108/01443570210414329
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper reviews the use of case study research in operations management for theory development and testing. It draws on the literature on case research in a number of disciplines and uses examples drawn from operations management research. It provides guidelines and a roadmap for operations management researchers wishing to design, develop and conduct case‐based research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01443570210414329

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Åhlström, P.A. Blackmon, K. and Voss, C.A. (1998), “Diagnostic benchmarking and manufacturing improvement”, in Coughlan, P., Dromgoole, T. and Peppard, J. (Eds), Operations Management – Future Issues and Competitive Responses, University of Dublin, Dublin, pp. 7‐12.
  2. Baccarach, S.B. (1989), “Organisational theories: some criteria for evaluation”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 496‐515. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Boyer, K.K. and McDermott, C. (1999), “Strategic consensus in operations strategy”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17, pp. 289‐305. · DOI
  4. Demaree, R.G. and Wolf, G. (1984), “Estimating within‐group inter‐rater reliability with and without response bias”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 85‐98. · DOI · Paper page
  5. DeVellis, R.F. (1991), Scale Development: Theory and Applications, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
  6. Drejer, A., Blackmon, K. and Voss, C. (1998), “Worlds apart? – a look at the operations management area in the US, UK and Scandinavia”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp. 45‐66. · DOI
  7. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building theory from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532‐50. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Finch, B.J. (1999), “Internet discussions as a source for consumer product customer involvement and quality information: an exploratory study”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17, pp. 535‐56. · DOI
  9. >Frohlich, M. (1998), “The implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies: an empirical study of surface mount technology”, unpublished DBA Thesis, Boston University, Boston, MA.
  10. Handfield, R.S. and Melnyk, S.A. (1998), “The scientific theory‐building process: a primer using the case of TQM”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 16, pp. 321‐39. · DOI
  11. Hayes, R.H. and Wheelwright, S.S. (1984), Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing, Wiley, New York, NY.
  12. Hill, T., Nicholson, A. and Westbrook, R. (1999), “Closing the gap: a polemic on plant‐based research in operations management”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 139‐56. · DOI
  13. Hyer, N.L. and Brown, K. (1999), “The discipline of real cells”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17, pp. 557‐74. · DOI
  14. Hyer, N.L., Brown, K.A. and Zimmerman, S. (1999b), “A socio‐technical systems approach to cell design: case study and analysis”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17, pp. 179‐203. · DOI
  15. Karlsson, C. and Åhlström, P. (1995), “Change processes towards lean production: the role of the remuneration system”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15 No. 11, pp. 80‐99. · DOI
  16. Karlsson, C. and Åhlström, P. (1997), “Changing product development strategy – a managerial challenge”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 14, pp. 473‐84. · DOI
  17. Karlsson, C., Nellore, R. and Söderquist, K. (1998), “Black box engineering: redefining the role of product specifications”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15, pp. 534‐49. · DOI
  18. Leonard‐Barton, D. (1990), “A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites”, Organisation Science, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 248‐66. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lewis, M.W. (1998), “Iterative triangulation: a theory development process using existing case studies”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 16, pp. 455‐69. · DOI
  20. McCutcheon, D. and Meredith, J. (1993), “Conducting case study research in operations management”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 239‐56. · DOI
  21. McLachlin, R. (1997), “Management initiatives and just‐in‐time manufacturing”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 15, pp. 271‐92. · DOI
  22. Meredith, J. (1998), “Building operations management theory through case and field research”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 16, pp. 441‐54. · DOI
  23. Meredith, J. and Vineyard, M. (1993), “A longitudinal study of the role of manufacturing technology in business strategy”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 13 No. 12, pp. 4‐24. · DOI
  24. Miles, H. and Huberman, M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
  25. Mintzberg, H. (1979), “An emerging strategy of ‘direct’ research”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, pp. 590‐601. · DOI
  26. Mukherjee, A., Mitchell, W. and Talbot, F.B. (2000), “The impact of new manufacturing technologies and strategically flexible production”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 18, pp. 139‐68. · DOI
  27. Narasimhan, R. and Jayaram, J. (1998), “Reengineering service operations, a longitudinal case study”, Journal of Operations Management, December, pp. 7‐22. · DOI
  28. Pagell, M. and Krause, D.R. (1999), “A multiple‐method study of environmental uncertainty and manufacturing flexibility”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17, pp. 307‐25. · DOI
  29. Pannirselvan, G., Ferguson, L., Ash, R. and Siferd, S. (1999), “Operations management research: an update for the 1990s”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 18, pp. 95‐112. · DOI
  30. Partington, D. (2000), “Building grounded theories of management action”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 11, pp. 91‐102. · DOI
  31. Ritzman, L.P. and Safizadeh, M.H. (1999), “Linking process choice with plant level decisions about capital and human resources”, Production and Operations Management, Muncie, Winter. · DOI
  32. Schein, E. H. (1987), The Clinical Perspective in Fieldwork, Sage, Newbury Park, CA. · DOI
  33. Schonberger, R. (1982), Japanese Manufacturing Techniques, The Free Press, New York, NY.
  34. Sousa, R. (2000), “Quality management practice: universal or context dependent? An empirical investigation”, unpublished PhD thesis, London Business School, London.
  35. Sousa, R. and Voss, C.A. (2001), “Quality management: universal or context dependent? An empirical investigation across the manufacturing strategy spectrum”, Production and Operations Management, forthcoming. · DOI
  36. Smith, N.L. (1987), “Towards a justification of claims in evaluation research”, Evaluation and Programme Planning, Vol. 10, pp. 209‐314. · DOI
  37. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
  38. Tyre, W. and Orlikowski, W.J. (1994), “Windows of opportunity: temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations”, Organization Science, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 98‐118. · DOI
  39. Van De Ven, A.H. (1989), “Nothing is quite as practical as a good theory”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 486‐9. · DOI
  40. Voss, C.A. (1984), “Multiple independent invention and the process of technological innovation”, Technovation, Vol. 2, pp. 169‐84. · DOI
  41. Wacker, J.G. (1998), “A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory building research methods in operations management”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 16, pp. 361‐85. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Yin, R. (1994), Case Study Research, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M.
Venue
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
195-219
ISSN
0144-3577
DOI
10.1108/01443570210414329
Cited by
2,963
References
5
Language
en
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review