Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,540

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research

Ali, Faizan, Rasoolimanesh, S. Mostafa, Sarstedt, Marko, Ringle, Christian M., Ryu, Kisang·2018·International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
DOI 10.1108/ijchm-10-2016-0568
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Structural equation modeling (SEM) depicts one of the most salient research methods across a variety of disciplines, including hospitality management. Although for many researchers, SEM is equivalent to carrying out covariance-based SEM, recent research advocates the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) as an attractive alternative. The purpose of this paper is to systematically examine how PLS-SEM has been applied in major hospitality research journals with the aim of providing important guidance and, if necessary, opportunities for realignment in future applications. Because PLS-SEM in hospitality research is still in an early stage of development, critically examining its use holds considerable promise to counteract misapplications which otherwise might reinforce over time. Design/methodology/approach All PLS-SEM studies published in the six SSCI-indexed hospitality management journals between 2001 and 2015 were reviewed. Tying in with the prior studies in the field, the review covers reasons for using PLS-SEM, data characteristics, model characteristics, the evaluation of the measurement models, the evaluation of the structural model, reporting and use of advanced analyses. Findings Compared to other fields, the results show that several reporting practices are clearly above standard but still leave room for improvement, particularly regarding the consideration of state-of-the art metrics for measurement and structural model assessment. Furthermore, hospitality researchers seem to be unaware of the recent extensions of the PLS-SEM method, which clearly extend the scope of the analyses and help gaining more insights from the model and the data. As a result of this PLS-SEM application review in studies, this research presents guidelines on how to accurately use the method. These guidelines are important for the hospitality management and other disciplines to disseminate and ensure the rigor of PLS-SEM analyses and reporting practices. Research limitations/implications Only articles published in the SSCI-indexed hospitality journals were examined and any journals indexed in other databases were not included. That is, while this research focused on the top-tier hospitality management journals, future research may widen the scope by considering hospitality management-related studies from other disciplines, such as tourism research or general management. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by providing hospitality researchers with the updated guidelines for PLS-SEM use. Based on a systematic review of current practices in the hospitality literature, critical methodological issues when choosing and using the PLS-SEM were identified. The guidelines allow to improve future PLS-SEM studies and offer recommendations for using recent advances of the method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijchm-10-2016-0568

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 103

  1. Aguirre-Urreta M.I., 2012, MIS Quarterly, 36, 123, 10.2307/41410409 · DOI
  2. Aguirre-Urreta M.I., 2015, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 36, 33
  3. Aguirre-Urreta M.I., 2018, MIS Quarterly
  4. 10.1177/1938965514535974 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.009 · DOI
  6. 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.01 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1177/1938965514553465 · DOI
  8. Benitez J., 2016, 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems (ACIS)
  9. 10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.005 · DOI
  10. 10.17705/1CAIS.03823 · DOI
  11. Bollen, K.A. and Diamantopoulos, A. (2017). “In Defense of Causal–Formative Indicators: a Minority Report”, Psychological Methods, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 581-596. · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/02664769922322 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1108/09596110910948288 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/20650323 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chin W.W., 1998, MIS Quarterly, 22, 12
  16. 10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/978-1-4614-8283-3_16 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Cochran W.G., 1977, Sampling Techniques
  19. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  20. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.04.005 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.05.010 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.008 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.004 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.csda.2014.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1177/0047287515569779 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.jhlste.2014.07.002 · DOI
  30. 10.1108/IMDS-06-2016-0248 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/1938965512466587 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.03.007 · DOI
  33. Garson G.D., 2016, Partial Least Squares Regression and Structural Equation Models, Statistical Associates
  34. Goodhue D.L., 2012, MIS Quarterly, 36, 981, 10.2307/41703490 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/01490400.2011.583165 · DOI
  36. 10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Hair J.F., 2017, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)
  38. 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Hair J.F., 2018, Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)
  42. 10.1007/s00180-009-0164-x · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1080/10705510903439003 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014 · doi:10.1108/s1474-7979(2009)0000020014 · Paper page
  46. 10.1509/jmkr.47.4.699 · DOI
  47. 10.2333/bhmk.34.95 · DOI
  48. 10.1086/376806 · DOI
  49. Jarvis C.B., 2012, MIS Quarterly, 36, 139, 10.2307/41410410 · DOI
  50. Jöreskog K.G., 1982, Systems under Indirect Observation, Part I, 263
  51. 10.1177/1096348012461542 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.05.001 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.pursup.2015.04.005 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::AID-SMJ819>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  55. 10.1177/1096348012436377 · DOI
  56. 10.1108/09596111311322925 · DOI
  57. 10.1108/09596111011042721 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.03.004 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.10.006 · DOI
  60. 10.1177/1938965514556149 · DOI
  61. 10.2307/3172730 · DOI
  62. 10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.02.010 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.10.007 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.04.011 · DOI
  66. 10.1177/1094428114529165 · DOI
  67. Marcoulides G.A., 2012, MIS Quarterly, 36, 717, 10.2307/41703477 · DOI
  68. Matthews L., 2018, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications
  69. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.04.010 · DOI
  70. 10.1007/978-981-10-5218-7 · DOI
  71. 10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2013-0582 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.03.003 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.01.015 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.001 · DOI
  76. 10.1108/IMR-04-2014-0148 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Rigdon E.E., 1998, Modern Methods for Business Research, 251
  78. 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.010 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-4 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1007/s00291-013-0320-0 · DOI
  83. 10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0317 · DOI
  84. 10.1177/1094428112474693 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1016/j.jom.2016.05.002 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.019 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.12.002 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.040 · DOI
  89. Sarstedt M., 2011, Advances in International Marketing, Volume 22, 195
  90. 10.1016/j.annals.2015.10.006 · DOI
  91. 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_9 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007 · DOI
  94. 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2013-0568 · DOI
  95. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1108/09596111011053765 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/S0167-8116(00)00016-1 · DOI
  98. 10.1177/10963480030274006 · DOI
  99. 10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.06.001 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.10.004 · DOI
  102. Wooldridge J.M., 2009, Introductory Econometrics. A Modern Approach
  103. Wright R.T., 2012, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 30, 367, 10.17705/1CAIS.03023 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K.
Venue
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2018-01-08
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
514-538
ISSN
0959-6119 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/ijchm-10-2016-0568
OpenAlex
W2768636149
Cited by
1,540
References
22
FWCI
66.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emeraldinsight.com/page/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.