Cited by 501Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AI

Blockchain's adoption in iot: the challenges, and a way forward

Open access
Makhdoom, Imran, Abolhasan, Mehran, Abbas, Haider, Ni, Wei·2019·Journal of Network and Computer Applications

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.10.019

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current strategy for security methods has generally emphasized key management, intrusion detection, authentication, and access control.

    “The current strategy for security methods has generally emphasized key management, intrusion detection, authentication, and access control (Makhdoom et al., 2019).”

    From IoMT amid COVID-19 pandemic: Application, architecture, technology, and security (2021) · cites this paper as Makhdoom et al., 2019

  • In IoT networks, data transmission has faced various challenges in terms of low security, high management cost of data centre and supervision complexity due to reliance on external infrastructure.

    “In IoT networks, data transmission has faced various challenges in terms of low security, high management cost of data centre and supervision complexity due to the reliance on the external infrastructure [165].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Survey on blockchain technologies and related services (2015). 1340 URL http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2016/pdf/0531 01f.pdf
  2. A. Banafa, IoT Standardization and Implementation Challenges, IEEE Internet of Things. URL http://iot.ieee.org/newsletter/july-2016/iot-standardization-and-implementation-challenges.html
  3. N. Szabo, The idea of smart contracts, IEEE International Workshop on Electronic Contracting (WEC).
  4. Y. Gao, H. Nobuhara, A proof of stake sharding protocol for scalable blockchains, Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Advanced Network 44 (2017) 13-16.
  5. E. A. Brewer, Towards robust distributed systems, in: PODC, Vol. 7, 2000.
  6. C. Cachin, Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Distributed Cryptocurrencies and Consensus Ledgers, Vol. 310, 2016.
  7. S. Chen, R. Ma, H.-H. Chen, H. Zhang, W. Meng, J. Liu, Machine-to-machine communications in ultra-dense networksa survey, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19 (3) (2017) 1478-1503.
  8. Bitcoin-Developer-Guide, Transactions, Developer Guide (2018. Last accessed 13 September 2018). URL https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-guide#transactions
  9. I. Eyal, A. E. Gencer, E. G. Sirer, R. Van Renesse, Bitcoin-ng: A scalable blockchain protocol, in: NSDI, 2016, pp. 45-59.
  10. G. Zyskind, O. Nathan, et al., Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), 2015, pp. 180-184.
  11. G. Zyskind, O. Nathan, et al., Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW),, 2015, pp. 180-184.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Makhdoom, I., Abolhasan, M., Abbas, H., & Ni, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Florida Institute of Technology (US)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Makhdoom, Imran
Venue
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
125
Pages
251-279
ISSN
1084-8045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899354183
Cited by
501
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 49
FWCI
96.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Network and Computer Applications (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
blockchain, Internet of Things, blockchain adoption, Internet of Things security, privacy, decentralized architecture, cryptographic security, data integrity, authentication, performance requirements, blockchain-IoT integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review