Cited by 76Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningSecurity and Verification in ComputingDigital Media Forensic Detection

A Systematic Review of Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks, Defensive Controls and Technologies

Open access
Malik, Jasmita, Muthalagu, Raja, Pawar, Pranav M.·2024·IEEE Access

Abstract

Adversarial machine learning (AML) attacks have become a major concern for organizations in recent years, as AI has become the industry’s focal point and GenAI applications have grown in popularity around the world. Organizations are eager to invest in GenAI applications and develop their own large language models, but they face numerous security and data privacy issues, particularly AML attacks. AML attacks have jeopardized numerous large-scale machine learning models. If carried out successfully, AML attacks can significantly reduce the efficiency and precision of machine learning models. They have far-reaching negative consequences in the context of critical healthcare and autonomous transportation systems. In this paper, AML attacks are identified, analyzed, and classified using adversarial tactics and techniques. This research also recommends open-source tools for testing AI and ML models against AML attacks. Furthermore, this research suggests specific mitigating measures against each attack. It aims to serve as a guidance for organizations to defend against AML attacks and gain assurance in the security of ML models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2024.3423323

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malik, J., Muthalagu, R., & Pawar, P. M.
Affiliations
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani - Dubai Campus (AE)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2024
Volume
12
Pages
99382-99421
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400314861
Cited by
76
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani for paying the Article Processing Charges (APC) of this publication
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
adversarial machine learning attacks, machine learning security, large language models, generative AI security, attack classification, defense mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review