Cited by 261Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AI

Integration of Blockchain and Cloud of Things: Architecture, Applications and Challenges

Open access
Nguyen, Dinh C., Pathirana, Pubudu N., Ding, Ming, Seneviratne, Aruna·2020·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Abstract

The blockchain technology is taking the world by storm. Blockchain with its decentralized, transparent and secure nature has emerged as a disruptive technology for the next generation of numerous industrial applications. One of them is Cloud of Things enabled by the combination of cloud computing and Internet of Things. In this context, blockchain provides innovative solutions to address challenges in Cloud of Things in terms of decentralization, data privacy and network security, while Cloud of Things offer elasticity and scalability functionalities to improve the efficiency of blockchain operations. Therefore, a novel paradigm of blockchain and Cloud of Things integration, called BCoT, has been widely regarded as a promising enabler for a wide range of application scenarios. In this article, we present a state-of-the-art review on the BCoT integration to provide general readers with an overview of the BCoT in various aspects, including background knowledge, motivation, and integrated architecture. Particularly, we also provide an in-depth survey of BCoT applications in different use-case domains such as smart healthcare, smart city, smart transportation and smart industry. Then, we review the recent BCoT developments with the emerging blockchain and cloud platforms, services, and research projects. Finally, some important research challenges and future directions are highlighted to spur further research in this promising area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comst.2020.3020092

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent research reports have revealed inherent security weaknesses in blockchain related to medical and healthcare systems.

    “However, recent research reports have revealed inherent security weaknesses in blockchain which are related to medical and healthcare systems [44].”
  • Bitcoin can process a maximum of four transactions/second, Ethereum about 20 transactions/second, and Visa up to 1667 transactions/second.

    “For example, Bitcoin can only process a maximum of four transactions/second, and the throughput of Ethereum achieved is about 20 transactions/second, while Visa can process up to 1667 transactions/second [44].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Published
2020
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
2521-2549
ISSN
  • 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-745X
OpenAlex
W2969602038
Cited by
261
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
34.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
CSIRO Data61, Australia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
blockchain, Cloud of Things, Internet of Things, cloud computing, decentralized architecture, data privacy, network security, smart healthcare, smart cities, smart transportation, smart industry, blockchain platforms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review