Cited by 57Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design

Very Low-Noise ENG Amplifier System Using CMOS Technology

Rieger, Robert, Schuettler, Martin, Pal, Dipankar, Clarke, Chris, Langlois, Peter, Taylor, John, Donaldson, Nick·2006·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the design and testing of a system for recording electroneurographic signals (ENG) from a multielectrode nerve cuff (MEC). This device, which is an extension of the conventional nerve signal recording cuff, enables ENG to be classified by action potential velocity. In addition to electrical measurements, we provide preliminary in vitro data obtained from frogs that demonstrate the validity of the technique for the first time. Since typical ENG signals are extremely small, on the order of 1 1 microV, very low-noise, high-gain amplifiers are required. The ten-channel system we describe was realized in a 0.8 microm CMOS technology and detailed measured results are presented. The overall gain is 10 000 and the total input-referred root mean square (rms) noise in a bandwidth 1 Hz-5 kHZ is 291 nV. The active area is 12 mm(2) and the power consumption is 24 mW from +/-2.5 V power supplies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2006.886731

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The choice of front-end amplifier gain is influenced by the required application, whether CNS or PNS recording, and by the system's power supply.

    “The choice of gain is influenced by the required application (CNS or PNS recording) and the system’s power supply [107].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rieger, R., Schuettler, M., Pal, D., Clarke, C., Langlois, P., Taylor, J., & Donaldson, N.
Affiliations
  • National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
  • Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra (IN)
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2006-12
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
427-437
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2151735029
Cited by
57
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/D03146X/1, GR/S93783/01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Keywords
electroneurography, low noise amplifier, CMOS integrated circuit, high-gain amplifier
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Amplifiers, Electronic, Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Microelectrodes, Peripheral Nerves, Semiconductors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Computer-Aided Design, Equipment Failure Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review