Cited by 396Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Exposure to Interparental Conflict and Children's Adjustment and Physical Health: The Moderating Role of Vagal Tone

El-Sheikh, Mona, Harger, JoAnn, Whitson, Stephanie M·2001·Child Development

Abstract

Physiological regulation, as indexed by baseline vagal tone and delta vagal tone (the change in vagal tone during an attention-demanding or challenging task), was examined as a moderator in the relations between exposure to verbal and physical parental marital conflict and children's adjustment and physical health. Higher vagal tone was posited to serve a protective function (i.e., buffer) for children exposed to higher levels of marital conflict. Seventy-five 8- to 12-year-olds and their mothers completed measures of parental conflict, and children's adjustment and physical health. Children's vagal tone was assessed during baseline conditions and during exposure to an audiotaped interadult argument. Results indicate that higher vagal tone buffered children against increased externalizing, internalizing, and health problems related to exposure to more frequent marital conflict, especially verbal conflict. Further, higher levels of delta vagal tone protected boys against externalizing problems associated with verbal conflict, and health problems associated with physical conflict.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8624.00369

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies indicate that appraisals moderate associations between interparental conflict and youth outcomes.

    “others indicate that appraisals moderate associations between interparental conflict and youth outcomes (El-Sheikh & Hager, 2001; El-Sheikh, Harger, & Whitson, 2001; Kerig, 1998; Rogers & Holmbeck, 1997; Rossman & Rosenberg, 1992).”

    From Interparental Conflict and Adolescents’ Romantic Relationship Conflict (2010) · cites this paper as El-Sheikh, Harger, & Whitson, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Sheikh, M., Harger, J., & Whitson, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn University , Auburn, AL
  • Auburn University (US)
Venue
Child Development
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
1617-1636
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2077085988
Cited by
396
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
RAND Corporation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
parental conflict, marital conflict, vagal tone, child adjustment, child physical health, verbal conflict, physical conflict, buffering, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, sex differences, physiological regulation, attention-demanding tasks
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Child, Communication, Conflict, Psychological, Family, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Marriage, Mother-Child Relations, Parents, Social Adjustment, Vagus Nerve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review