Cited by 39Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health InterventionsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Balance-a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of an online intensive self-help alcohol intervention

Brendryen, Håvar, Lund, Ingunn Olea, Johansen, Ayna Beate, Riksheim, Marianne, Nesvåg, Sverre, Duckert, Fanny·2014·Addiction

Abstract

AIMS: To compare a brief versus a brief plus intensive self-help version of 'Balance', a fully automated online alcohol intervention, on self-reported alcohol consumption. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Participants in both conditions received an online single session screening procedure including personalized normative feedback. The control group also received an online booklet about the effects of alcohol. The treatment group received the online multi-session follow-up program, Balance. SETTING: Online study in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: At-risk drinkers were recruited by internet advertisements and assigned randomly to one of the two conditions (n = 244). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was self-reported alcohol consumption the previous week measured 6 months after screening. FINDINGS: Regression analysis, using baseline carried forward imputation (intent-to-treat), with baseline variables as covariates, showed that intervention significantly affected alcohol consumption at 6 months (B = 2.96; 95% confidence interval = 0.02-5.90; P = 0.049). Participants in the intensive self-help group drank an average of three fewer standard alcohol units compared with participants in the brief self-help group. CONCLUSIONS: The online Balance intervention, added to a brief online screening intervention, may aid reduction in alcohol consumption compared with the screening intervention and an educational booklet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/add.12383

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brendryen, H., Lund, I. O., Johansen, A. B., Riksheim, M., Nesvåg, S., & Duckert, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • SERAF—Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Corresponding author
Brendryen, Håvar
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-11-21
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
218-226
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1603339734
Cited by
39
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
self-help intervention, personalized normative feedback, alcohol consumption reduction, at-risk drinkers, brief screening, automated intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Female, Humans, Male, Pamphlets, Self Care, Self-Help Groups, Treatment Outcome, Remote Consultation, Internet, Feedback, Psychological, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review