Cited by 14Digital Mental Health Interventionsscientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

The rise of artificial intelligence for cognitive behavioral therapy: A bibliometric overview

Open access
Vanhée, Loïs, Andersson, Gerhard, Garcia, Danilo, Sikström, Sverker·2025·Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being

Abstract

Recent years have seen a sharply rising interest in the scientific area dedicated to the study of the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) research and applications (AI4CBT for brevity). Yet, little is known about how this interest is realized and hence the overall status, prospects, and possible challenges of AI4CBT as a field (e.g. breadth of the field, key topics and methods, key producing countries/institutions/authors, interdisciplinary grounding). This paper addresses this gap by developing a broad-spectrum bibliometric analysis towards acquiring a comprehensive overview of the AI4CBT field. Four key dimensions are analyzed (productivity, producers, productions, and contents) along the array of bibliographic metrics, including production trends over time, leading contributors at various levels, co-authorship, citation, and keywords co-occurrence networks, publication formats, key venues, methodological trends, and disciplinary assessment. The paper concludes by framing the status of AI4CBT as a scientific field, allowing to tie it to scientific and applicative challenges and opportunities that AI4CBT may encounter and offer as it further develops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aphw.70033

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Devlin, J. (2018). Bert: Pre‐training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:181004805.
  2. Horned, A, & Vanhée, L. (2023b). Models of Anxiety for Agent Deliberation: The Benefits of Anxiety‐Sensitive Agents. In: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 1761–1767.
  3. Jiang, M., Zhao, Q., Li, J., Wang, F., He, T., Cheng, X., Yang, B. X., Ho, G. W., & Fu, G. (2024). A Generic Review of Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. arXiv preprint arXiv:240719422.
  4. Koroteev, M. V. (2021). BERT: a review of applications in natural language processing and understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:210311943.
  5. Lindgren, S. (2023a). Critical theory of AI. John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Mulukuntla, S. (2022). Generative AI‐benefits, limitations, potential risks and challenges in healthcare industry. EPH‐International Journal of Medical and Health Science, 8(4), 1– 9.
  7. Norvig PR, Intelligence SA. A modern approach. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA Rani, M., Nayak, R., & Vyas, O. P. (2015). An ontology‐based adaptive personalized e‐learning system, assisted by software agents on cloud storage knowledge‐based systems 2002 (Vol. 90) (pp. 33– 48).
  8. Rothbaum, B. O., Meadows, E. A., Resick, P., & Foy, D. W. (2000). Cognitive‐behavioral therapy. The Guilford Press.
  9. Salim, S. S., & Yusoff, N. (2008). Ethics and Information Privacy in Affective Computing. In: the Proceedings of the Regional Development International Conference and Exhibition (REDICE08).
  10. Vanhée, L. (2023). Organizing transdisciplinary research and innovation: The case of the socially‐aware artificial intelligence focus area (pp. 10– 18). MULTITTRUST@HAI.
  11. Vanhée, L., & Borit, M. (2024). How Interdisciplinary Are Agent Based Models in General and Those of Human Decision in Particular? A Bibliometric Analysis. In Conference of the European social simulation. Association Springer. In press
  12. Varadarajan, V., Sikström, S., Kjell, O. N., & Schwartz, H. A. (2023). Adaptive Language‐based Mental Health Assessment with Item‐ Response Theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:231106467.
  13. Woo, J., Grimaldi, M., Pelachaud, C., & Achard, C. (2023). IAVA: Interactive and Adaptive Virtual Agent. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. 1–8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanhée, L., Andersson, G., Garcia, D., & Sikström, S.
Affiliations
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Vanhée, Loïs
Venue
Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-04-24
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
e70033-e70033
ISSN
  • 1758-0846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-0854
OpenAlex
W4409743167
Cited by
14
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet (2023–04505)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
artificial intelligence, cognitive behavioral therapy, digital mental health, research trends, co-authorship networks, citation analysis, interdisciplinary research, research productivity
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Bibliometrics, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review