Cited by 39Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Triggers a Long-Term Shift toward More Positive Appraisals of Emotional Ambiguity

Open access
Harp, Nicholas R., Freeman, Jonathan B., Neta, Maital·2022·Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Abstract

= .01). Together, mindfulness promotes a relatively long-lasting shift toward positivity bias, which is uniquely supported by reduced emotional reactivity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xge0001173

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Fox J, & Weisberg S (2019). An R Companion to Applied Regression, Third edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.
  2. Harp NR, & Neta M (2021, November 22). Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Triggers a Long-term Shift Toward More Positive Appraisals of Emotional Ambiguity. Retrieved from osf.io/dx4ke PMC9308822 35073138
  3. Kiken LG, & Shook NJ (2011). Looking up: Mindfulness increases positive judgments and reduces negativity bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(4), 425– 431. doi: 10.1177/1948550610396585 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kieslich PJ, Henninger F, Wulff DU, Haslbeck JMB, & Schulte-Mecklenbeck M (2019). Mouse-tracking: A practical guide to implementation and analysis. In Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Kühberger A, & Johnson JG (Eds.), A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods (pp. 111– 130). New York, NY: Routledge.
  5. Pauker K, Rule NO, & Ambady N (2010). Ambiguity and social perception. In Social psychology of visual perception (pp. 7– 26). Psychology Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harp, N. R., Freeman, J. B., & Neta, M.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology General
Published
2022-09
Volume
151
Issue
9
Pages
2160-2172
ISSN
  • 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2222
OpenAlex
W4206935934
Cited by
38
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (111640)
  • Nebraska Tobacco Settlement Biomedical Research Enhancement Funds
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, emotional ambiguity, positivity bias, emotional appraisal, emotional reactivity, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Emotions, Facial Expression, Happiness, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review