Cited by 49Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

Nutrient availability and corn growth in a poultry litter biochar‐amended loam soil in a greenhouse experiment

Brantley, K. E., Savin, M. C., Brye, K. R., Longer, D. E.·2016·Soil Use and Management

Abstract

Nutrient‐rich biochar produced from animal wastes, such as poultry litter, may increase plant growth and nutrient uptake although the role of direct and indirect mechanisms, such as stimulation of the activity of mycorrhizal fungi and plant infection, remains unclear. The effects of poultry litter biochar in combination with fertilizer on mycorrhizal infection, soil nutrient availability and corn ( Zea mays L.) growth were investigated by growing corn in a loam soil in a greenhouse with biochar (0, 5 and 10 Mg/ha) and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizer (0, half and full rates). Biochar did not affect microbial biomass C or N, mycorrhizal infection, or alkaline phosphomonoesterase activities, but acid phosphomonoesterase activities, water‐soluble P, Mehlich‐3 Mg, plant height, aboveground and root biomass, and root diameter were greater with 10 Mg/ha than with no biochar. Root length, volume, root tips and surface area were greatest in the fully fertilized soil receiving 10 Mg/ha biochar compared to all other treatments. The 10 Mg/ha biochar application may have improved plant access to soil nutrients by promoting plant growth and root structural features, rather than by enhancing mycorrhizal infection rates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/sum.12296

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contents of secondary nutrients including sulfur, calcium, and magnesium are high in animal manure biochar.

    “As shown in Table 4, contents of secondary nutrients including S, Ca, and Mg are high in animal manure biochar, as reported by Xiao et al. (2018) and Brantley et al. (2016).”

    From Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant (2020) · cites this paper as Brantley et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brantley, K. E., Savin, M. C., Brye, K. R., & Longer, D. E.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Corresponding author
Savin, M. C.
Venue
Soil Use and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-25
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
279-288
ISSN
  • 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2743
OpenAlex
W2507436069
Cited by
49
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
poultry litter biochar, maize growth, maize, soil nutrient availability, mycorrhizal colonization, phosphomonoesterase activity, root morphology, nitrogen fertilization, phosphorus fertilizer, microbial biomass carbon, loam soil, plant growth promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review