Cited by 138

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective and hyperactive uptake of foreign DNA by adaptive immune systems of an archaeon via two distinct mechanisms

Erdmann, Susanne, Garrett, Roger A.·2012·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Central to the disparate adaptive immune systems of archaea and bacteria are clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR). The spacer regions derive from invading genetic elements and, via RNA intermediates and associated proteins, target and cleave nucleic acids of the invader. Here we demonstrate the hyperactive uptake of hundreds of unique spacers within CRISPR loci associated with type I and IIIB immune systems of a hyperthermophilic archaeon. Infection with an environmental virus mixture resulted in the exclusive uptake of protospacers from a co‐infecting putative conjugative plasmid. Spacer uptake occurred by two distinct mechanisms in only one of two CRISPR loci subfamilies present. In two loci, insertions, often multiple, occurred adjacent to the leader while in a third locus single spacers were incorporated throughout the array. Protospacer DNAs were excised from the invading genetic element immediately after CCN motifs, on either strand, with the secondary cut apparently produced by a ruler mechanism. Over a 10‐week period, there was a gradual decrease in the number of wild‐type cells present in the culture but the virus and putative conjugative plasmid were still propagating. The results underline the complex dynamics of CRISPR‐based immune systems within a population infected with genetic elements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08171.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 CRISPR loci and viruses infecting S. solfataricus P2. A. Scheme of six CRISPR loci of S. solfataricus P2, their associated leader regions (L), and genes encoding adaptation-associated Cas1, Cas2 and Cas4. Numbers of repeat-spacer units within CRISPR arrays are given. B and C. Electron micrographs of virus particles isolated from (B) supernatant of the enrichment culture, and (C) S. solfataricus P2 6 days post infection with the virus mixture in (B). Samples were negatively stained with 1% uranyl acetate and size bars are included.
Fig. 1 CRISPR loci and viruses infecting S. solfataricus P2. A. Scheme of six CRISPR loci of S. solfataricus P2, their associated leader regions (L), and genes encoding adaptation-associated Cas1, Cas2 and Cas4. Numbers of repeat-spacer units within CRISPR arrays are given. B and C. Electron micrographs of virus particles isolated from (B) supernatant of the enrichment culture, and (C) S. solfataricus P2 6 days post infection with the virus mixture in (B). Samples were negatively stained with 1% uranyl acetate and size bars are included.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Growth curves of virus-infected S. solfataricus P2 and spacer uptake in CRISPR loci. A. Growth curves for uninfected (dark blue) and virus-infected (light blue) wild-type cells, and for uninfected (dark green) and infected (light green) CRISPR-minus strain. B. Growth curves for uninfected (dark blue) and virus-infected (light blue) wild-type cells at onset of spacer uptake (10–12 days). A600 measurements were made every 6 h. C. PCR products amplified from leader proximal regions of CRISPR loci A to F of wild-type strain and matched to growth curves (Dpi3 and Dpi12). Dpi, days post infection.
Fig. 2 Growth curves of virus-infected S. solfataricus P2 and spacer uptake in CRISPR loci. A. Growth curves for uninfected (dark blue) and virus-infected (light blue) wild-type cells, and for uninfected (dark green) and infected (light green) CRISPR-minus strain. B. Growth curves for uninfected (dark blue) and virus-infected (light blue) wild-type cells at onset of spacer uptake (10–12 days). A600 measurements were made every 6 h. C. PCR products amplified from leader proximal regions of CRISPR loci A to F of wild-type strain and matched to growth curves (Dpi3 and Dpi12). Dpi, days post infection.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Assembly of newly inserted spacer sequences. Composition of one contig generated from overlapping spacer sequences on both DNA strands. Arrowheads indicate the direction away from the leader (corresponding to spacer crRNA sequence). Two spacers (in red) have opposite orientations. Spacers are preceded by a CCN protospacer-associated motif (PAM) (Lillestøl et al., 2009) (in blue and bold type). CCN motifs with no detected spacers (green). Loci origins and spacer lengths are indicated.
Fig. 3 Assembly of newly inserted spacer sequences. Composition of one contig generated from overlapping spacer sequences on both DNA strands. Arrowheads indicate the direction away from the leader (corresponding to spacer crRNA sequence). Two spacers (in red) have opposite orientations. Spacers are preceded by a CCN protospacer-associated motif (PAM) (Lillestøl et al., 2009) (in blue and bold type). CCN motifs with no detected spacers (green). Loci origins and spacer lengths are indicated.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Yields of virus and putative conjugative plasmid in single clones carrying new spacers. Reinfection with the purified virus mixture of isolated single clones containing new spacers in locus C (S11), loci C and D (S3) and in loci C, D and E (S10). PCR products of orf174 within an operon in viral contig 1 (Table 3) and of the traG-like gene in contig 2 of the putative conjugative plasmid (Table 4) were PCR-amplified from DNA isolated from cultures 2 and 20 days post infection (Dpi).
Fig. 4 Yields of virus and putative conjugative plasmid in single clones carrying new spacers. Reinfection with the purified virus mixture of isolated single clones containing new spacers in locus C (S11), loci C and D (S3) and in loci C, D and E (S10). PCR products of orf174 within an operon in viral contig 1 (Table 3) and of the traG-like gene in contig 2 of the putative conjugative plasmid (Table 4) were PCR-amplified from DNA isolated from cultures 2 and 20 days post infection (Dpi).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Yields of virus and putative conjugative plasmid in the wild-type culture over a 74-day period. PCR products are shown for orf174 of the virus and the traG-like gene of the putative conjugative plasmid isolated from cultures 2–74 days post infection (Dpi). Template DNA was isolated from 2 ml of infected cells and concentrations were adjusted to be the same for each sample prior to PCR analysis.
Fig. 5 Yields of virus and putative conjugative plasmid in the wild-type culture over a 74-day period. PCR products are shown for orf174 of the virus and the traG-like gene of the putative conjugative plasmid isolated from cultures 2–74 days post infection (Dpi). Template DNA was isolated from 2 ml of infected cells and concentrations were adjusted to be the same for each sample prior to PCR analysis.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1126/science.1157358 · DOI
  2. Aranaz A., 1996, Spacer oligonucleotide typing of Mycobacterium bovis strains from cattle and other animals: a tool for studying epidemiology of tuberculosis, J Clin Microbiol, 34, 2734, 10.1128/jcm.34.11.2734-2740.1996 · DOI
  3. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01573.x · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.1138140 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06488.x · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.0901238106 · DOI
  7. 10.1099/mic.0.28048-0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1126/science.1159689 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/nar/gkr1111 · DOI
  10. 10.1128/JB.01412-07 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02266.x · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.tim.2011.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1042/BST0390051 · DOI
  14. 10.1155/2004/151926 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb00976.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07452.x · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.040 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.10.023 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/4361101a · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1112832108 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01784.x · DOI
  22. 10.1128/iai.59.8.2695-2705.1991 · DOI
  23. 10.1128/JB.01415-07 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nsmb.2019 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/JCM.35.4.907-914.1997 · DOI
  26. 10.1155/2006/542818 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06641.x · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.11.019 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/nrmicro2577 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07586.x · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.1165771 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1099/mic.0.023960-0 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00280.x · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.mib.2007.05.017 · DOI
  36. 10.1099/mic.0.27437-0 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1006/plas.1998.1363 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nrmicro1527 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.04.027 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.09.001 · DOI
  42. 10.1042/BST0370023 · DOI
  43. Shah S.A., 2011, Regulatory RNAs in Prokaryotes, 163
  44. 10.1073/pnas.141222098 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.resmic.2008.04.015 · DOI
  46. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035888 · DOI
  47. 10.1073/pnas.112047299 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04428.x · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01444.x · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.virol.2007.01.035 · DOI
  51. 10.1101/gr.100396.109 · DOI
  52. 10.1128/JVI.79.14.8677-8686.2005 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/nar/gks216 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.013 · DOI
  55. Zillig W., 1994, Screening for Sulfolobales, their plasmids and their viruses in Icelandic solfataras, Syst Appl Microbiol, 16, 109
  56. 10.1007/s007920050052 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Erdmann, S., & Garrett, R. A.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-27
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
1044-1056
ISSN
  • 0950-382X
  • 1365-2958
Cited by
138
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review