The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reinterpreting the Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator From the Perspective of the Five‐Factor Model of Personality
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI, Myers & McCaulley, 1985) was evaluated from the perspectives of Jung's theory of psychological types and the five‐factor model of personality as measured by self‐reports and peer ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI, Costa & McCrae, 1985b) Data were provided by 267 men and 201 women ages 19 to 93 Consistent with earlier research and evaluations, there was no support for the view that the MBTI measures truly dichotomous preferences or qualitatively distinct types, instead, the instrument measures four relatively independent dimensions The interpretation of the Judging‐Perceiving index was also called into question The data suggest that Jung's theory is either incorrect or inadequately operationalized by the MBTI and cannot provide a sound basis for interpreting it However, correlational analyses showed that the four MBTI indices did measure aspects of four of the five major dimensions of normal personality The five‐factor model provides an alternative basis for interpreting MBTI findings within a broader, more commonly shared conceptual framework
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
Self-citationTrait-names: A psycho-lexical study.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093360 · Cited by 2,018
Cited by
An Introduction to the Five‐Factor Model and Its Applications
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x · Cited by 6,835
Self-citationThe development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530
The structure of phenotypic personality traits.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.1.26 · Cited by 4,816
Learning Styles and Pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004) · Newcastle University · doi:10.25405/ncl.34085991 · Cited by 1,810
Conceptions and Correlates of Openness to Experience
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997) · Handbook of Personality Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-012134645-4/50032-9 · Cited by 1,093
Self-citationEvolutionary Personality Psychology
Buss, D. M. (1991) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002331 · Cited by 930
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1456 · Cited by 499
HIGHER‐ORDER DIMENSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND THE BIG SIX VOCATIONAL INTEREST TYPES
MOUNT, M. K., BARRICK, M. R., SCULLEN, S. M., & ROUNDS, J. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00468.x · Cited by 463
Cross-Cultural Assessment of the Five-Factor Model: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J.-P., & Parker, W. D. (1998) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022198291009 · Cited by 406
Self-citationOpenness to Experience: Expanding the boundaries of Factor V
McCrae, R. R. (1994) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2410080404 · Cited by 373
Self-citationPredictive biases in natural language processing models: A conceptual framework and overview
Shah, D. S., Schwartz, H. A., & Hovy, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.468 · Cited by 241
Player Typology in Theory and Practice
Bateman, C., Lowenhaupt, R., & Nacke, L. (2011) · DiGRA Digital Library · doi:10.26503/dl.v2011i1.562 · Cited by 146
Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences.
Armstrong, P. I., Day, S. X., McVay, J. P., & Rounds, J. (2008) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.1 · Cited by 136
Replicability and 40-year predictive power of childhood ARC types.
Chapman, B. P., & Goldberg, L. R. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024289 · Cited by 115
Brophy, D. R. (2001) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1334_20 · Cited by 115
Work-related well-being in the South African Police Service
Mostert, K., & Rothmann, S. (2006) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.09.003 · Cited by 114
PANDORA Talks: Personality and Demographics on Reddit
Gjurković, M., Karan, M., Vukojević, I., Bošnjak, M., & Snajder, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.socialnlp-1.12 · Cited by 58
Oliveira, E., Galvao de Barba, P., & Corrin, L. (2021) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.6792 · Cited by 50
Jiménez‐Hernández, E. M., Oktaba, H., Díaz‐Barriga, F., & Piattini, M. (2020) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22335 · Cited by 29
A Review of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Public Affairs Education
Sample, J. (2017) · Journal of Public Affairs Education · doi:10.1080/15236803.2017.12002300 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-40
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W2073043307
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
