The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods
Open accessAbstract
Summary: This report describes a set of scientific procedures used to assess the impact of foods and food ingredients on the expression of appetite (psychological and behavioural). An overarching priority has been to enable potential evaluators of health claims about foods to identify justified claims and to exclude claims that are not supported by scientific evidence for the effect cited. This priority follows precisely from the principles set down in the PASSCLAIM report. The report allows the evaluation of the strength of health claims, about the effects of foods on appetite, which can be sustained on the basis of the commonly used scientific designs and experimental procedures. The report includes different designs for assessing effects on satiation as opposed to satiety, detailed coverage of the extent to which a change in hunger can stand alone as a measure of appetite control and an extensive discussion of the statistical procedures appropriate for handling data in this field of research. Because research in this area is continually evolving, new improved methodologies may emerge over time and will need to be incorporated into the framework. One main objective of the report has been to produce guidance on good practice in carrying out appetite research, and not to set down a series of commandments that must be followed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pocock, S. J., Assmann, S. E., Enos, L. E., & Kasten, L. E. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1296 · Cited by 1,077
Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight
DiMeglio, D., & Mattes, R. (2000) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801229 · Cited by 882
King, N. A., Hopkins, M., Caudwell, P., Stubbs, R. J., & Blundell, J. E. (2008) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803712 · Cited by 429
Self-citationParker, B. A., Sturm, K., MacIntosh, C. G., Feinle, C., Horowitz, M., & Chapman, I. M. (2004) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601768 · Cited by 322
Bell, E. A., & Rolls, B. J. (2001) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/73.6.1010 · Cited by 319
Meal frequency and energy balance
Bellisle, F., McDevitt, R., & Prentice, A. M. (1997) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19970104 · Cited by 279
Appetite sensations and satiety quotient: Predictors of energy intake and weight loss
Drapeau, V., King, N., Hetherington, M., Doucet, E., Blundell, J., & Tremblay, A. (2007) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2006.08.002 · Cited by 248 · cited 1×
“The satiety quotient relates the suppression of hunger (or change in fullness) to the energy content of the meal consumed and has now been used in a variety of contexts that demonstrate its capacity to describe the strength of satiety generated by food consumption (102), exercise (103) or related to the biology of the…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPassclaim*: Consensus on Criteria
Aggett, P. J., Antoine, J.-M., Asp, N.-G., Bellisle, F., Contor, L., Cummings, J. H., Howlett, J., Müller, D. J. G., Persin, C., Pijls, L. T. J., et al. (2005) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-005-1104-3 · Cited by 157
Appetite sensations as a marker of overall intake
Drapeau, V., Blundell, J., Therrien, F., Lawton, C., Richard, D., & Tremblay, A. (2005) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn20041312 · Cited by 125
Self-citationJohnstone, A. M., Shannon, E., Whybrow, S., Reid, C. A., & Stubbs, R. J. (2000) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114500000039 · Cited by 58
Cited by
Dietary fibre modulates the gut microbiota
Cronin, P., Joyce, S. A., O’Toole, P. W., & O’Connor, E. M. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13051655 · Cited by 658
Steinert, R. E., Feinle-Bisset, C., Asarian, L., Horowitz, M., Beglinger, C., & Geary, N. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2014 · Cited by 578
The role of protein in weight loss and maintenance
Leidy, H. J., Clifton, P. M., Astrup, A., Wycherley, T. P., Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S., Luscombe-Marsh, N. D., Woods, S. C., & Mattes, R. D. (2015) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.084038 · Cited by 475
Leeners, B., Geary, N., Tobler, P. N., & Asarian, L. (2017) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmw045 · Cited by 407
The effect of fiber on satiety and food intake: a systematic review
Clark, M. J., & Slavin, J. L. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2013.791194 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Blundell, J., De Graaf, C., Hulshof, T., Jebb, S., Livingstone, B., Lluch, A., Mela, D., Salah, S., Schuring, E., Van Der Knaap, H., & Westerterp, M.
- Venue
- Obesity Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-22
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 251-270
- ISSN
- 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-789X
- OpenAlex
- W2121499324
- Cited by
- 1,007
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 17.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-789x.2010.00714.x
- The paper
- Blundell, J., De Graaf, C., Hulshof, T., Jebb, S., Livingstone, B., Lluch, A., Mela, D., Salah, S., Schuring, E., Van Der Knaap, H., & Westerterp, M. (2010). Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods. Obesity Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789x.2010.00714.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
