The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Wick in the Candle of Learning: Epistemic Curiosity Activates Reward Circuitry and Enhances Memory
Abstract
Curiosity has been described as a desire for learning and knowledge, but its underlying mechanisms are not well understood. We scanned subjects with functional magnetic resonance imaging while they read trivia questions. The level of curiosity when reading questions was correlated with activity in caudate regions previously suggested to be involved in anticipated reward. This finding led to a behavioral study, which showed that subjects spent more scarce resources (either limited tokens or waiting time) to find out answers when they were more curious. The functional imaging also showed that curiosity increased activity in memory areas when subjects guessed incorrectly, which suggests that curiosity may enhance memory for surprising new information. This prediction about memory enhancement was confirmed in a behavioral study: Higher curiosity in an initial session was correlated with better recall of surprising answers 1 to 2 weeks later.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“M. J. Kang, Hsu, Krajbich, Loewenstein, McClure, Wang, and Camerer (2009) found that the higher participants rated their curiosity about a question answered incorrectly, the more likely they were to recall the correct answer on a surprise test two weeks later.”
From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as M. J. Kang, Hsu, Krajbich, Loewenstein, McClure, Wang, and Camerer (2009)
In the citing paper
“Curiosity has been shown to follow an inverted-U-shaped function of confidence in the prediction (e.g., Kang et al., 2009).”
From Predicting as a learning strategy (2021) · cites this paper as Kang et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
Brainard, D. H. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00357 · Cited by 20,012 · cited 2×
“The two sessions in Experiment 2 were conducted and analyzed in Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA) using the Psychophysics Toolbox (Brainard, 1997) and the Eyelink Toolbox (Cornelissen, Peters, & Palmer, 2002).”
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate
Genovese, C. R., Lazar, N. A., & Nichols, T. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1037 · Cited by 4,923
Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions
Panksepp, J. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195096736.001.0001 · Cited by 4,428
(1998) · Cited by 4,012
Dopamine, learning and motivation.
Wise, R. A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1406 · Cited by 3,379 · cited 1×
“A reward is an object or event that elicits approach and is worked for (Wise, 2004).”
Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089910 · Cited by 2,891
The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation.
Loewenstein, G. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75 · Cited by 2,738 · cited 7×
“Philosophers and psychologists have described curiosity as an appetite for knowledge, a drive like hunger and thirst (Loewenstein, 1994), the hunger pang of an ‘‘info-vore’’ (Biederman & Vessel, 2006, p. 247), and ‘‘the wick in the candle of learning’’ (William Arthur Ward, cited by Wikiquote,…”
InfluentialSelf-citationAnticipation of Increasing Monetary Reward Selectively Recruits Nucleus Accumbens
Knutson, B., Adams, C. M., Fong, G. W., & Hommer, D. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-16-j0002.2001 · Cited by 2,244
Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.
Beatty, J. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276 · Cited by 1,959 · cited 2×
“Because pupil dilation is known to be linked to arousal, attention, interest, and cognitive effort (Beatty, 1982; Hess & Polt, 1960), and because anticipatory pupillary responses increase following a stimulus that predicts rewards (O’Doherty, Dayan, Friston, Critchley, & Dolan, 2003), the observed…”
Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions
Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (1999) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)7:4 · Cited by 1,888
The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment
de Quervain, D. J.-F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100735 · Cited by 1,768 · cited 1×
“…Fissell, Noll, & Fiez, 2000), including social rewards such as benevolent reciprocity (Fehr & Camerer, 2007; King-Casas et al., 2005), social cooperation (Rilling et al., 2002), altruistic punishment (de Quervain et al., 2004), and winning an auction (Delgado, Schotter, Ozbay, & Phelps, 2008).”
Building Memories: Remembering and Forgetting of Verbal Experiences as Predicted by Brain Activity
Wagner, A. D., Schacter, D. L., Rotte, M., Koutstaal, W., Maril, A., Dale, A. M., Rosen, B. R., & Buckner, R. L. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5380.1188 · Cited by 1,644 · cited 1×
“These regions are thought to be involved in successful verbal memory encoding (Brewer, Zhao, Desmond, Glover, & Gabrieli, 1998; Paller & Wagner, 2002; Wagner et al., 1998).”
Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain
O'Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Friston, K., Critchley, H., & Dolan, R. J. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00169-7 · Cited by 1,522
A neural basis for social cooperation
Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00755-9 · Cited by 1,451 · cited 2×
“, 2005), social cooperation (Rilling et al., 2002), altruistic punishment (de Quervain et al.”
Bookheimer, S. (2002) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946 · Cited by 1,450 · cited 1×
“2) and was part of Broca’s area, which is important for language comprehension (Bookheimer, 2002).”
Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: Insights from neuroimaging
O’Doherty, J. P. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.016 · Cited by 1,426 · cited 2×
“…be linked to curiosity because a growing body of evidence suggests that activity in the human striatum is correlated with the level of reward signals (Hare, O’Doherty, Camerer, Schultz, & Rangel, 2008; Knutson, Westdorp, Kaiser, & Hommer, 2000; McClure, York, & Montague, 2004; O’Doherty, 2004).”
FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task
Knutson, B., Westdorp, A., Kaiser, E., & Hommer, D. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0593 · Cited by 1,414 · cited 1×
“This interpretation is consistent with the recent finding that unexpected punishments and unexpected rewards produce very similar BOLD responses in the putamen at the time of outcomes (Knutson et al., 2000; Seymour, Daw, Dayan, Singer, & Dolan, 2007).”
Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange
King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1108062 · Cited by 1,345 · cited 2×
“…& Fiez, 2003; Delgado, Nystrom, Fissell, Noll, & Fiez, 2000), including social rewards such as benevolent reciprocity (Fehr & Camerer, 2007; King-Casas et al., 2005), social cooperation (Rilling et al., 2002), altruistic punishment (de Quervain et al., 2004), and winning an auction…”
Self-citationO’Reilly, R. C., & Frank, M. J. (2005) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976606775093909 · Cited by 1,124 · cited 1×
“Recent computational neural network models suggest another compatible interpretation involving memory (Frank, Loughry, & O’Reilly, 2001; O’Reilly & Frank, 2006).”
Tracking the Hemodynamic Responses to Reward and Punishment in the Striatum
Delgado, M. R., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, C., Noll, D. C., & Fiez, J. A. (2000) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2000.84.6.3072 · Cited by 1,116
Making Memories: Brain Activity that Predicts How Well Visual Experience Will Be Remembered
Brewer, J. B., Zhao, Z., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5380.1185 · Cited by 1,108
The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox
Cornelissen, F. W., Peters, E. M., & Palmer, J. C. (2002) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195489 · Cited by 1,049
Berlyne, D. E. (1954) · British Journal of Psychology General Section · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1954.tb01243.x · Cited by 985 · cited 2×
“The latter type of curiosity is called diversive perceptual curiosity and can be found in various animals (Berlyne, 1954).”
Reward-motivated learning: mesolimbic activation precedes memory formation
Adcock, R. A., Thangavel, A., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Knutson, B., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.036 · Cited by 977
Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli
Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.132.3423.349 · Cited by 899 · cited 2×
“When the 968 Volume 20—Number 8 answer appeared (0–1,000 ms after the onset of the answer), the average PDR differed significantly across the three trial types, p < .03 (one-tailed), prep .91, d 0.18.”
Influential(1921) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/xxx.119.375 · Cited by 885
Rogers, R. D., Owen, A. M., Middleton, H. C., Williams, E., Pickard, J. D., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (1999) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-20-09029.1999 · Cited by 882
Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model
FRANK, M. J., LOUGHRY, B., & O'REILLY, R. C. (2001) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.1.2.137 · Cited by 879
Observing the transformation of experience into memory
Paller, K. A., & Wagner, A. D. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01845-3 · Cited by 852 · cited 2×
“This internal representation in the lateral PFC, particularly in the left IFG, is a crucial component of long-term memory consolidation and is critical in the learning of new information (Paller & Wagner, 2002).”
Hare, T. A., O'Doherty, J., Camerer, C. F., Schultz, W., & Rangel, A. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1309-08.2008 · Cited by 792
Self-citationSocial neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences
Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002 · Cited by 779 · cited 1×
“…(Delgado, Locke, Stenger, & Fiez, 2003; Delgado, Nystrom, Fissell, Noll, & Fiez, 2000), including social rewards such as benevolent reciprocity (Fehr & Camerer, 2007; King-Casas et al., 2005), social cooperation (Rilling et al., 2002), altruistic punishment (de Quervain et al., 2004), and…”
Self-citationPredictability modulates human brain response to reward
Berns, G. S., McClure, S. M., Pagnoni, G., & Montague, P. R. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-08-02793.2001 · Cited by 711
Self-citationReward expectancy in primate prefrental neurons
Watanabe, M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382629a0 · Cited by 684 · cited 1×
“The dorsal striatum responds to magnitude of primary rewards and reward prediction (Leon & Shadlen, 1999; Rogers et al., 1999) and shows sustained phasic activations during reward expectation (Watanabe, 1996).”
Dopamine: generalization and bonuses
Kakade, S. M., & Dayan, P. (2002) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(02)00048-5 · Cited by 495 · cited 1×
“In reinforcement learning, a novelty bonus is used to motivate the choice of unexplored strategies (Kakade & Dayan, 2002).”
The neural substrates of reward processing in humans: the modern role of FMRI
McClure, S. M., York, M. K., & Montague, P. R. (2004) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858404263526 · Cited by 480
Self-citationDifferential Encoding of Losses and Gains in the Human Striatum
Seymour, B., Daw, N. D., Dayan, P., Singer, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0400-07.2007 · Cited by 479
Leon, M. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80854-5 · Cited by 449 · cited 1×
“The dorsal striatum responds to magnitude of primary rewards and reward prediction (Leon & Shadlen, 1999; Rogers et al., 1999) and shows sustained phasic activations during reward expectation (Watanabe, 1996).”
Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations
DELGADO, M. R., LOCKE, H. M., STENGER, V. A., & FIEZ, J. A. (2003) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.3.1.27 · Cited by 431
Perceptual Pleasure and the Brain
Biederman, I., & Vessel, E. A. (2006) · American Scientist · doi:10.1511/2006.59.247 · Cited by 400 · cited 1×
“…and psychologists have described curiosity as an appetite for knowledge, a drive like hunger and thirst (Loewenstein, 1994), the hunger pang of an ‘‘info-vore’’ (Biederman & Vessel, 2006, p. 247), and ‘‘the wick in the candle of learning’’ (William Arthur Ward, cited by Wikiquote, 2008).”
Human Midbrain Sensitivity to Cognitive Feedback and Uncertainty During Classification Learning
Aron, A. R., Shohamy, D., Clark, J. A., Myers, C. E., Gluck, M. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01209.2003 · Cited by 276 · cited 1×
“Previous studies have found that the expectation of feedback is sufficient for activation of the caudate (Aron et al., 2004).”
Maril, A., Wagner, A. D., & Schacter, D. L. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00396-8 · Cited by 235
Simon, S. R., Meunier, M., Piettre, L., Berardi, A. M., Segebarth, C. M., & Boussaoud, D. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2002.88.4.2047 · Cited by 231 · cited 1×
“There are also studies that have reported striatal activations in response to negatively valenced stimuli (Knutson, Adams, Fong, & Hommer, 2001) or during nonreward activity such as working memory and motor preparation (Cairo, Liddle, Woodward, & Ngan, 2004; Simon et al., 2002).”
Albert Einstein: Creator and Rebel
Frisch, O. R. (1973) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/24/11/021 · Cited by 219
Understanding Overbidding: Using the Neural Circuitry of Reward to Design Economic Auctions
Delgado, M. R., Schotter, A., Ozbay, E. Y., & Phelps, E. A. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158860 · Cited by 180
Perceptual Pleasure and the Brain
Biederman, I., & Vessel, E. A. (2006) · American Scientist · doi:10.1511/2006.59.995 · Cited by 132
The influence of working memory load on phase specific patterns of cortical activity
Cairo, T. A., Liddle, P. F., Woodward, T. S., & Ngan, E. T. C. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.014 · Cited by 130
Incentive effects and pupillary changes in association learning.
Kahneman, D. J., & Peavler, W. S. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0026912 · Cited by 125
Albert Einstein. Creator and rebel.
Hoffmann, B., & Dukas, H. (1972) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 106
Rodrigue, J. R., Olson, K. R., & Markley, R. P. (1987) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf01183135 · Cited by 27
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wikiquote., 2008, William Arthur Ward
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity
Kidd, C., & Hayden, B. Y. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.010 · Cited by 1,026
Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: computational and neural mechanisms
Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P.-Y., Lopes, M., & Baranes, A. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.001 · Cited by 784
Revisiting the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Generation of Interest
RENNINGER, K. A., & HIDI, S. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587723 · Cited by 786
“Fifth, interest has a physiological/neurological basis; brain activations differ when a learner is and is not engaged with interest (e.g., Hidi, 2006; Kang et al., 2009; Palmer, 2009; Panksepp, 1998).”
InfluentialStates of Curiosity Modulate Hippocampus-Dependent Learning via the Dopaminergic Circuit
Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Ranganath, C. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060 · Cited by 812
“Participants recalled significantly more answers to high curiosity questions, compared to low curiosity questions (70.6% SE= ± 2.60 vs. 54.1% SE= ± 3.04; paired-sample t (17) =5.64, p <0.001; Figure 3A) replicating earlier findings (Kang et al., 2009).”
InfluentialThe Emerging Neuroscience of Intrinsic Motivation: A New Frontier in Self-Determination Research
Di Domenico, S. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145 · Cited by 542
“The curiosity studies by Kang et al. (2009) and Gruber et al. (2014) found greater activity within the lateral PFC during curiosity-inducing questions.”
BackgroundMethodResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T.-Y., & Camerer, C. F.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- National Taiwan University (TW)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 963-973
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2104225738
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Keywords
- curiosity, caudate nucleus, reward anticipation, trivia questions, memory enhancement, surprise, resource allocation, waiting time, token allocation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Arousal, Attention, Brain, Caudate Nucleus, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Frontal Lobe, Globus Pallidus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Oxygen, Putamen, Reading, Mental Recall, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Parahippocampal Gyrus, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
