Cited by 197Stress Responses and CortisolTryptophan and brain disordersCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response

Social-Evaluative Threat and Proinflammatory Cytokine Regulation: An Experimental Laboratory Investigation

Open access
Dickerson, Sally S., Gable, Shelly L., Irwin, Michael R., Aziz, Najib, Kemeny, Margaret E.·2009·Psychological Science

Abstract

This study experimentally tested whether a stressor characterized by social-evaluative threat (SET), a context in which the self can be judged negatively by others, would elicit increases in proinflammatory cytokine activity and alter the regulation of this response. This hypothesis was derived in part from research on immunological responses to social threat in nonhuman animals. Healthy female participants were assigned to perform a speech and a math task in the presence or absence of an evaluative audience (SET or non-SET, respectively). As hypothesized, stimulated production of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) increased from baseline to poststressor in the SET condition, but was unchanged in the non-SET condition. Further, the increases in TNF-α production correlated with participants' cognitive appraisals of being evaluated. Additionally, the ability of glucocorticoids to shut down the inflammatory response was decreased in the SET condition. These findings underscore the importance of social evaluation as a threat capable of eliciting proinflammatory cytokine activity and altering its regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02437.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In two human studies, the effects of acute stress on glucocorticoid resistance were confined to women.

    “In both of these latter studies, however, the effects of acute stress on glucocorticoid resistance were confined to women, highlighting a need for additional research on this topic.”

    From From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: A social signal transduction theory of depression. (2014) · cites this paper as Dickerson, Gable, Irwin, Aziz, & Kemeny, 2009

    The Abstract says this study was limited to healthy women, and the Results report decreased glucocorticoid sensitivity in the social-evaluative-threat condition. But the Discussion says all participants were women and calls for research on whether the findings generalize to men. The study therefore cannot establish that the effect was confined to women rather than also occurring in men. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exposure to social cues indicating an increased risk for possible physical danger induces glucocorticoid resistance.

    “Evidence that even acute stress can alter glucocorticoid sensitivity is provided by research showing that exposure to social cues indicating an increased risk for possible physical danger induces glucocorticoid resistance.”

    From From stress to inflammation and major depressive disorder: A social signal transduction theory of depression. (2014) · cites this paper as Dickerson, Gable, Irwin, Aziz, & Kemeny, 2009

    The Results (Glucocorticoid Inhibition of Stimulated TNF-α Production; page unavailable) report decreased glucocorticoid sensitivity after an acute social-evaluative stressor compared with a non-evaluative condition. But the study tested evaluation by an audience, not social cues indicating an increased risk of physical danger. The Discussion presents possible wounding after an antagonistic encounter as an explanation, not a tested feature of the cues. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Negative social evaluation also elicits autonomic nervous system activation, proinflammatory cytokine increases, and self-reported negative affect.

    “Negative social evaluation also elicits autonomic nervous system activation, proinflammatory cytokine increases, and self-reported negative affect (Akinola and Mendes, 2008; Bosch et al., 2009; Dickerson et al., 2009).”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Dickerson et al., 2009

    The Discussion reports increased TNF-α production in the social-evaluative condition. The Results (Task Appraisals and Manipulation Checks) report cardiovascular activation, but it was similar with and without social evaluation; the Assessments section does not report a measure of self-reported negative affect. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Participants judged the two TSST conditions (with vs. without socially rejecting raters) to be equally challenging, controllable, and difficult.

    “participants judged these two conditions to be equally challenging, controllable, and difficult”
  • Individuals who completed the TSST in the presence of socially rejecting raters exhibited greater in vitro LPS-stimulated production of TNFα and greater glucocorticoid resistance than individuals who performed the TSST in the absence of these raters.

    “individuals who completed the TSST in the presence of socially rejecting raters exhibited greater in vitro LPS-stimulated production of TNFα and greater glucocorticoid resistance than individuals who performed the TSST in the absence of these raters”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickerson, S. S., Gable, S. L., Irwin, M. R., Aziz, N., & Kemeny, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Dickerson, Sally S.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2009-10
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
1237-1244
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2108820669
Cited by
197
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources ((M01 RR00865), M01RR000865)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Keywords
social-evaluative threat, inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α, stress, cognitive appraisal, glucocorticoids, inflammation modulation, social evaluation, speaking tasks, audience evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Blood Pressure, Emotions, Female, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Mathematics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Speech, Stress, Psychological, Task Performance and Analysis, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Cytokines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review