Cited by 120Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Incentive‐elicited mesolimbic activation and externalizing symptomatology in adolescents

Open access
Bjork, James M., Chen, Gang, Smith, Ashley R., Hommer, Daniel W.·2010·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Opponent‐process theories of externalizing disorders (ExD) attribute them to some combination of overactive reward processing systems and/or underactive behavior inhibition systems. Reward processing has been indexed by recruitment of incentive‐motivational neurocircuitry of the ventral striatum (VS), including nucleus accumbens (NAcc). Methods: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with an incentive task to determine whether externalizing symptomatology in adolescence is correlated with an enhanced VS recruitment by cues for rewards, or by deliveries of rewards. Twelve community‐recruited adolescents with externalizing disorders (AED) and 12 age/gender‐matched controls responded to targets to win or avoid losing $0, $0.20, $1, $5, or an unknown amount (ranging from $0.20 to $5). Results: Cues to respond for rewards activated the NAcc (relative to cues for no incentive), in both subject groups similarly, with greatest NAcc recruitment by cues for the largest reward. Loss‐anticipatory NAcc signal increase was detected in a volume‐of‐interest analysis – but this increase occurred only in trials when subjects hit the target. Relative to controls, AED showed significantly elevated NAcc activation by a linear contrast between reward notification versus notification of failure to win reward. In a post hoc reanalysis, VS and pregenual anterior cingulate activation by the reward versus non‐reward outcome contrast also directly correlated with Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Externalizing total scores (across all subjects) in lieu of a binary diagnosis. Finally, both groups showed right insula activation by loss notifications (contrasted with avoided losses). Conclusions: Externalizing behavior, whether assessed dimensionally with a questionnaire, or in the form of a diagnostic categorization, is associated with an exaggerated limbic response to outcomes of reward‐directed behavior. This could be a neurobiological signature of the behavioral sensitivity to laboratory reward delivery that is characteristic of children with externalizing symptomatology. Of interest is future research on incentive‐motivational processing in more severe, clinically referred AED.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02201.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bjork et al. reported increased subgenual cortex activation in adolescents with externalizing disorders during a monetary incentive-delay task.

    “whereas Bjork et al. [652] reported increased subgenual cortex activation in adolescents with externalizing disorders during a monetary incentive-delay task.”
  • Other studies reported enhanced striatal and medial prefrontal/orbitofrontal reactivity during reward outcome processing in children and adolescents with ADHD relative to TDC.

    “other studies reported enhanced striatal and medial prefrontal/orbitofrontal reactivity during reward outcome processing in children and adolescents with ADHD relative to TDC (Bjork et al., 2010, Gatzke-Kopp et al., 2009, Paloyelis et al., 2012, Rubia et al., 2009a).”

    From Differentiating neural reward responsiveness in autism versus ADHD (2014) · cites this paper as Bjork et al., 2010

  • Adolescents exhibit decreased VS response to some reward conditions, or increased VS activity is associated with more adaptive functioning such as increased resistance to peer influence and decreased risky behavior.

    “Complicating this view, however, are studies in which adolescents exhibit decreased VS response to some reward conditions (Geier et al., 2010; van Leijenhorst et al., 2010; and Bjork et al., 2010), or increased VS activity is associated with more adaptive functioning such as increased resistance to peer influence and decreased risky behavior (Pfeifer et al., 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bjork, J. M., Chen, G., Smith, A. R., & Hommer, D. W.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-07
Volume
51
Issue
7
Pages
827-837
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2131069012
Cited by
120
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 DA999999)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (ZIAAA000081)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
externalizing disorders, adolescents, mesolimbic system, nucleus accumbens, ventral striatum, reward processing, loss anticipation, insula, behavioral inhibition, opponent process theory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Arousal, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child Behavior Disorders, Cues, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Inhibition, Psychological, Internal-External Control, Knowledge of Results, Psychological, Limbic System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mesencephalon, Motivation, Nerve Net, Nucleus Accumbens, Oxygen, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Conduct Disorder, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review