The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE VALIDITY OF THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS MODEL: A REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS
Abstract
The validity of Hackman and Oldham's Job Characteristics Model was assessed by conducting a comprehensive review of nearly 200 relevant studies on the model as well as by applying meta‐analytic procedures to a large portion of the data. The evidence indicated that the available correlational results are reasonably valid in light of the issues examined. Results tended to support the multidimensionality of job characteristics, but there was less agreement on the exact number of dimensions. The corrected correlational results of the meta‐analysis indicated that job characteristics related both to psychological and behavioral outcomes. Concerning psychological states, the results tended to support their mediating (e.g., intervening) role between job characteristics and personal outcomes. The pattern of correlations between the job characteristics and psychological states was less supportive of the model. Meta‐analytic results demonstrated that most of the cross‐study variance was due to statistical artifacts. True variance across studies was found for the job characteristics‐performance relationship, however, and subsequent analyses suggested that growth‐need strength moderates this relationship. Implications for potential revisions of the model and for practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Employee reactions to job characteristics.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031152 · Cited by 2,442
Cited by
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
KRISTOF‐BROWN, A. L., ZIMMERMAN, R. D., & JOHNSON, E. C. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x · Cited by 4,082
EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: PERSONAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS AT WORK.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256657 · Cited by 3,749
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 · Cited by 2,994
CHRISTIAN, M. S., GARZA, A. S., & SLAUGHTER, J. E. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x · Cited by 2,903
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303
Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis.
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0035661 · Cited by 1,981
Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., & Locke, E. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.237 · Cited by 1,142
Grant, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108 · Cited by 1,114
Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.496 · Cited by 837
The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600404 · Cited by 690
Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda
Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006 · Cited by 670
Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes: A Meta-analysis
Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A. (2012) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9259-4 · Cited by 623
Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Cordery, J. L. (2001) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317901167460 · Cited by 617
Ashford, S. J., Caza, B. B., & Reid, E. M. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001 · Cited by 582
de Treville, S., & Antonakis, J. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.001 · Cited by 549
Parker, S. K. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.620 · Cited by 438
Morris, M. G., & Venkatesh, V. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721418 · Cited by 437
Kuvaas, B. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.377 · Cited by 422
Janssen, P. P. M., De Jonge, J., & Bakker, A. B. (1999) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01022.x · Cited by 357
Empathy and the emergence of task and relations leaders
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.12.003 · Cited by 337
Bellé, N. (2014) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mut033 · Cited by 332
Do servant-leaders help satisfy follower needs? An organizational justice perspective
Mayer, D. M., Bardes, M., & Piccolo, R. F. (2008) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320701743558 · Cited by 322
Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.46 · Cited by 316
Thriving at work—A diary study
Niessen, C., Sonnentag, S., & Sach, F. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.763 · Cited by 315
Long work hours: a social identity perspective on meta‐analysis data
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.536 · Cited by 264
APPLYING SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY TO ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH
Sheldon, K. M., Turban, D. B., Brown, K. G., Barrick, M. R., & Judge, T. A. (2004) · Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-7301(03)22008-9 · Cited by 214
Weekly job crafting and leisure crafting: implications for meaning-making and work engagement
Petrou, P., Bakker, A. B., & van den Heuvel, M. (2017) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12160 · Cited by 200
Zhang, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3966-3 · Cited by 180
Erez, M. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.651 · Cited by 126
Do the Hustle! Empowerment from Side-Hustles and Its Effects on Full-Time Work Performance
Sessions, H., Nahrgang, J. D., Vaulont, M. J., Williams, R., & Bartels, A. L. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2018.0164 · Cited by 116
The SMART model of work design: A higher order structure to help see the wood from the trees
Parker, S. K., & Knight, C. (2024) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22200 · Cited by 108
The Effective Design of Work Under Total Quality Management
Victor, B., Boynton, A., & Stephens-Jahng, T. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.1.102.12566 · Cited by 101
Do lean manufacturing practices have negative impact on job satisfaction?
Minh, K. S., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., & Heidari, S. (2019) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-11-2016-0072 · Cited by 77
Gu, H., Wen, Z., & Fan, X. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00740 · Cited by 22
“The global flow experience was found to be positively associated with autonomy, and this makes sense, as previous research (e.g., Fried and Ferris, 1987; Saavedra and Kwun, 2000) indicated that when employees could schedule their work and determine some aspects of their job, this could contribute…”
ResultAI Where It Matters: Where, Why, and How Developers Want AI Support in Daily Work
Choudhuri, R., Badea, C., Bird, C., Butler, J. L., DeLine, R., & Houck, B. (2026) · Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 48th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice · doi:10.1145/3786583.3786885 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- FRIED, Y., & FERRIS, G. R.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 287-322
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2097150325
- Cited by
- 1,631
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.