Cited by 205Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsAdvancements in Battery Materials

CRITERIA FOR SELECTING ELECTRODES FOR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Brummer, S. B., Robblee, L. S., Hambrecht, F. T.·1983·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Smaller, more charge-intensive electrodes are needed for "safe" stimulation of the nervous system. In this paper we review critical concepts and the state of the art in electrodes. Control of charge density and charge balance are essential to avoid tissue electrolysis. Chemical criteria for "safe" stimulation are reviewed ("safe" is equated with "chemically reversible"). An example of a safe, but generally impractical, charge-injection process is double-layer charging. The limit here is the onset of irreversible faradaic processes. More charge can be safely injected with so-called "capacitor" electrodes, such as porous intermixtures of Ta/Ta2O5. BaTiO3 has excellent dielectric properties and may provide a new generation of capacitor electrodes. Faradaic charge injection is usually partially irreversible since some of the products escape into the solution. With Pt, up to 400 muc/cm2 real area can be absorbed by faradaic reactions of surface-adsorbed species, but a small part is lost due to metal dissolution. The surface of "activated" Ir is covered with a multilayer hydrated oxide. Charge injection occurs via rapid valence change within this oxide. Little or no metal dissolution is observed, and gassing limits are not exceeded even under stringent conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb31628.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brummer, S. B., Robblee, L. S., & Hambrecht, F. T.
Affiliations
  • EIC Laboratories (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-06
Volume
405
Issue
1
Pages
159-171
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2014316686
Cited by
205
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
Keywords
electrode selection, charge density, charge balance, double-layer charging, capacitor electrodes, BaTiO3 dielectric, platinum electrode, iridium oxide, metal dissolution
MeSH terms
Electric Injuries, Electric Stimulation, Electrochemistry, Electrodes, Humans, Iridium, Neurons, Platinum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review