Cited by 46Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeurological disorders and treatmentsUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

In vivo comparison of the charge densities required to evoke motor responses using novel annular penetrating microelectrodes

Open access
Brunton, Emma K., Winther-Jensen, Bjorn, Wang, Chun, Yan, Edwin B., Hagh Gooie, Saman, Lowery, Arthur J., Rajan, Ramesh·2015·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Electrodes for cortical stimulation need to deliver current to neural tissue effectively and safely. We have developed electrodes with a novel annular geometry for use in cortical visual prostheses. Here, we explore a critical question on the ideal annulus height to ensure electrical stimulation will be safe and effective. We implanted single electrodes into the motor cortex of anesthetized rats and measured the current required to evoke a motor response to stimulation, and the charge injection capacity (CIC) of the electrodes. We compared platinum iridium (PtIr) electrodes with different annulus heights, with and without a coating of porous titanium nitride (TiN). Threshold charge densities to evoke a motor response ranged from 12 to 36 μC.cm(-2).ph(-1). Electrodes with larger geometric surface areas (GSAs) required higher currents to evoke responses, but lower charge densities. The addition of a porous TiN coating did not significantly influence the current required to evoke a motor response. The CIC of both electrode types was significantly reduced in vivo compared with in vitro measurements. The measured CIC was 72 and 18 μC.cm(-2).ph(-1) for electrodes with and without a TiN coating, respectively. These results support the use of PtIr annular electrodes with annulus heights greater than 100 μm (GSA of 38, 000 μm(2)). However, if the electrodes are coated with porous TiN the annulus height can be reduced to 40 μm (GSA of 16,000 μm(2)).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2015.00265

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Titanium nitride coated electrodes have exhibited good electrochemical stability and charge injection limits similar to that of iridium oxide, but the biocompatibility of the coating still needs to be investigated further.

    “Titanium nitride (TiN) coated electrodes have exhibited good electrochemical stability and charge injection limits similar to that of iridium oxide, but the biocompatibility of the coating still needs to be investigated further (Brunton et al. 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brunton, E. K., Winther-Jensen, B., Wang, C., Yan, E. B., Hagh Gooie, S., Lowery, A. J., & Rajan, R.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Brunton, Emma K.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2015-05-12
Volume
09
Pages
265-265
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1552093808
Cited by
46
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
cortical stimulation, charge injection capacity, motor cortex stimulation, platinum-iridium electrodes, visual prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review