Cited by 234Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesChild and Animal Learning Development

Clinical assessment of autism in high-risk 18-month-olds

Brian, J., Bryson, S.E., Garon, N., Roberts, W., Smith, I.M., Szatmari, P., Zwaigenbaum, L.·2008·Autism

Abstract

Earlier intervention improves outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), but existing identification tools are at the limits of standardization with 18-month-olds. We assessed potential behavioural markers of ASD at 18 months in a high-risk cohort of infant siblings of children with ASD. Prospective data were collected using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and Autism Observation Scale for Infants (AOSI) on 155 infant siblings and 73 low-risk controls at 18 months. Infants were classified into three groups (ASD sibs, non-ASD sibs, controls) based on blind best-estimate diagnosis at age 3. Fisher's exact tests, followed by discriminant function analyses, revealed that the majority of informative ADOS items came from the social and behavioural domains, and AOSI items measuring behavioural reactivity and motor control contributed additional information. Findings highlight the importance of considering not only social-communication deficits, but also basic dimensions of temperament including state regulation and motor control when assessing toddlers with suspected ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361308094500

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brian, J., Bryson, S. E., Garon, N., Roberts, W., Smith, I. M., Szatmari, P., & Zwaigenbaum, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre (CA)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Autism
Published
2008-09
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
433-456
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2142104347
Cited by
234
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks
  • Bloorview Research Institute
  • Dalhousie University
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, infant siblings, high-risk infants, early detection, behavioural markers, autism screening, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, temperament, government regulation, motor control, social communication deficits, toddlers
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Discriminant Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review