Cited by 284Public Procurement and PolicySustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploiting the Potential of Public Procurement: Opportunities for Circular Economy

Abstract

Summary: The objective of a circular economy (CE) is to maintain the value of products, materials, and resources in the economy by closing material loops and minimizing waste generation. In recent years, the role of public procurement has been recognized as an important, but as yet not fully exploited, opportunity by cities and municipalities in their transition toward circular societies. This study analyzed public procurement opportunities to promote CE. Different approaches and examples of circular public procurement were identified using case studies. In addition, opportunities to promote CE through sustainable and green public procurement policy were identified analyzing predefined sustainable or green public procurement criteria. The study concludes that public procurement can promote CE and related business models by setting criteria and requirements for the extension of product life spans, efficiency and/or intensity of use, and efficient cycling of biological or technical materials, as well as for the securing of clean and nonrisky cycles. Circular procurement can occur through the procurement of better‐quality products in circular terms, the procurement of new circular products, the use of business concepts that support the CE, and investments in circular ecosystems. Several sectors and product groups were identified as having potential for circular procurement, such as construction, waste, and wastewater management, transportation, food, and catering, furniture, and textiles. The study also suggests that the use of certain tools, such as performance‐based procurement, life cycle approach, and life cycle costing, as well as criteria concerning reuse and recycling of materials, could promote circular procurement. Market dialogue and cooperation between procurers and actors in the supply chains are important for the future development of circular procurement.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jiec.12770

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Schoenmakere M., 2017, Circular by design—Products in the circular economy
  2. Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC.Official Journal of the European Union28.3.2014. Council of the European Union European Parliament 2014.
  3. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.2012.Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 1: An economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Available at:www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/TCE_Report-2013.pdf. Accessed 27 January 2017.
  4. European Commission.2007.Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament the Council the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Mid‐term Review of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme. COM(2007) 225 final. Brussels: EC.
  5. Hillgrén A., 2015, Nordic best practices relevant for UNEP 10YFP of sustainable consumption and production
  6. Mazzucato M., 2015, The innovative state. Governments should make markets, not just fix them, Foreign Affairs, 94, 61
  7. Rolfstam M. L.Hommen J.Edler L.Tsipouri andJ.Rigby.2005.Innovation and public procurement. Review of issues at stake. Study for the European Commission (No ENTR/03/24). Karlsruhe Germany: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.
  8. Yin R. K., 2003, Applied social research methods series

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Alhola, K., Ryding, S. O., Salmenperä, H., & Busch, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Finnish Environment Institute (FI)
  • IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (CN)
  • Copenhagen Resource Institute (NIRAS) Copenhagen Denmark
Corresponding author
Alhola, Katriina
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2018-05-15
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
96-109
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W2804613968
Cited by
284
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5
FWCI
24.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nordisk Ministerråd (1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
circular economy, circular public procurement, green public procurement, sustainable public procurement, procurement criteria, product life extension, material reuse and recycling, performance-based procurement, life cycle cost analysis, life cycle approach, circular business models, circular ecosystems, municipal procurement, construction industry, waste management, wastewater management, transportation, supply chain collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review