Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reduced Aβ secretion by human neurons under conditions of strongly increased BACE activity

Scholz, Diana, Chernyshova, Yana, Ückert, Anna‐Katharina, Leist, Marcel·2018·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

The initial step in the amyloidogenic cascade of amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing is catalyzed by beta‐site APP‐cleaving enzyme (BACE), and this protease has increased activities in affected areas of Alzheimer's disease brains. We hypothesized that altered APP processing, because of augmented BACE activity, would affect the actions of direct and indirect BACE inhibitors. We therefore compared post‐mitotic human neurons (LUHMES) with their BACE‐overexpressing counterparts (B LUHMES). Although β‐cleavage of APP was strongly increased in BLUHMES, they produced less full‐length and truncated amyloid beta (Aβ) than LUHMES. Moreover, low concentrations of BACE inhibitors decreased cellular BACE activity as expected, but increased Aβ 1‐40 levels. Several other approaches to modulate BACE activity led to a similar, apparently paradoxical, behavior. For instance, reduction in intracellular acidification by bepridil increased Aβ production in parallel with decreased BACE activity. In contrast to BLUHMES, the respective control cells (LUHMES or BLUHMES with catalytically inactive BACE) showed conventional pharmacological responses. Other non‐canonical neurochemical responses (so‐called ‘rebound effects’) are well‐documented for the Aβ pathway, especially for γ‐secretase: a partial block of its activity leads to an increased Aβ secretion by some cell types. We therefore compared LUHMES and BLUHMES regarding rebound effects of γ‐secretase inhibitors and found an Aβ rise in LUHMES but not in BLUHMES. Thus, different cellular factors are responsible for the γ‐secretase‐ versus BACE‐related Aβ rebound. We conclude that increased BACE activity, possibly accompanied by an altered cellular localization pattern, can dramatically influence Aβ generation in human neurons and affect pharmacological responses to secretase inhibitors. Open Practices: Open Science: This manuscript was awarded with the Open Materials Badge. For more information see: https://cos.io/our-services/open-science-badges/ image

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jnc.14467

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.130 · DOI
  2. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04421.1999 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/jm0705408 · DOI
  4. 10.1074/jbc.M009899200 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1074/jbc.M005339200 · DOI
  6. 10.1046/j.0022-3042.2002.00770.x · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.M804175200 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/85064 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.01.011 · DOI
  10. 10.1074/jbc.M003202200 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1074/jbc.M409680200 · DOI
  12. 10.1074/jbc.M409272200 · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104117 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.218 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/tp.2013.59 · DOI
  16. 10.2174/1567205012666141218125042 · DOI
  17. 10.2174/156720508783954695 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s00401-007-0312-8 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1074/jbc.M211485200 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1001/archneur.59.9.1381 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/jnc.12937 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/ja000300g · DOI
  23. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71051920.x · DOI
  24. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600061 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/357500a0 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003040 · DOI
  27. 10.1074/jbc.M002095200 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/ng0106-11 · DOI
  29. 10.1096/fj.08-106666 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1074/jbc.M004175200 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1074/jbc.M111141200 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0751085.x · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.01.064 · DOI
  34. 10.1083/jcb.200201123 · DOI
  35. 10.1159/000095267 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/mp.2015.97 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1074/jbc.275.5.3173 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32449-3 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1242/jcs.109.5.991 · DOI
  40. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3872-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1124/jpet.106.110700 · DOI
  42. 10.1385/MB:29:1:47 · DOI
  43. 10.1074/jbc.M210105200 · DOI
  44. 10.1083/jcb.200301115 · DOI
  45. 10.1083/jcb.200407070 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07560.x · DOI
  47. 10.1021/bi015800g · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1746-05.2005 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/85059 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031084 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/nchembio.1508 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1199-10.2010 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/0006-291X(92)90269-Q · DOI
  54. 10.1007/s00204-017-1966-1 · DOI
  55. 10.3233/JAD-2004-6107 · DOI
  56. 10.1074/jbc.274.27.18851 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/ana.22308 · DOI
  58. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2513-11.2011 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1074/jbc.M507016200 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.taap.2009.07.027 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07255.x · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.03.012 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/0006-8993(96)00002-9 · DOI
  64. 10.1021/jm049379g · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1093/toxsci/kfr034 · DOI
  66. 10.1074/jbc.R800019200 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1038/nsmb.1743 · DOI
  68. 10.1126/science.286.5440.735 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3657-09.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.028 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.ab.2009.01.008 · DOI
  72. 10.1074/jbc.M011116200 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90177-3 · DOI
  74. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07501.x · DOI
  75. 10.1074/jbc.M104350200 · DOI
  76. 10.1038/nm0103-3 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1038/nbt0997-871 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Scholz, D., Chernyshova, Y., Ückert, A., & Leist, M.
Affiliations
Chair for in vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine University of Konstanz Konstanz Germany
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-26
Volume
147
Issue
2
Pages
256-274
ISSN
  • 0022-3042
  • 1471-4159
Cited by
11
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1120/3‐1; RTG1331)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review