Cited by 77Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeural dynamics and brain function

The effects of prolonged intracortical microstimulation on the excitability of pyramidal tract neurons in the cat

McCreery, Douglas B., Agnew, William F., Bullara, Leo A.·2002·Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the excitability changes induced in cerebral cortical neurons during prolonged microstimulation with a spatially dense microelectrodes array. The arrays of 16 iridium microelectrodes were implanted chronically into the postcruciate gyrus of cats. Neuronal responses characteristic of single pyramidal tract axons (ULRs) were recorded in the medullary pyramid. 7 h of pulsing of individual electrodes at 50 Hz and at 4 nC/ph induced little or no change in the ULRs' electrical thresholds. The thresholds also were quite stable when 4 of the 16 microelectrodes were pulsed on each of 14 consecutive days. However, when all 16 microelectrodes were pulsed for 7 h at 4 nC/ph, the threshold of approximately half of the ULRs became elevated. Recovery of excitability required 2-18 days. Prolonged sequential (interleaved) pulsing of the 16 microelectrodes induced less depression of excitability than did simultaneous pulsing, but only when the stimulus amplitude was low (12 A, 1.8 nC/ph). Stimulation at a higher amplitude (15 nC/ph) induced much more depression of excitability. These findings imply that multiple processes mediate the stimulation-induced depression of neuronal excitability. The data also demonstrate that the depression can be reduced by employing a stimulus regimen in which the inherent spatial resolution of the array is maximized (sequential pulsing at an amplitude in which there is minimal overlap of the effective current fields).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1114/1.1430748

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The work of Shannon, McCreery et al., and Cogan et al. established guidelines for stimulation levels regarded as safe for the stimulated tissues and the materials of the stimulating electrodes.

    “The work of Shannon (21), McCreery et al. (47, 48), and Cogan et al. (20, 49) established some guidelines for stimulation levels that are regarded as safe both for the stimulated tissues and the materials of the stimulating electrodes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCreery, D. B., Agnew, W. F., & Bullara, L. A.
Affiliations
Huntington Medical Research Institutes (US)
Venue
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Published
2002-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
107-119
ISSN
0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055388286
Cited by
77
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ns082388-000)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (N01-NS-82388, N01-NS-5-2324)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
intracortical microstimulation, neuronal excitability, pyramidal tract neurons, corticospinal tract, electrical threshold, stimulus amplitude, cats
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Cats, Differential Threshold, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Iridium, Microelectrodes, Models, Neurological, Motor Cortex, Neurons, Pyramidal Tracts, Reaction Time, Refractory Period, Electrophysiological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review