Cited by 595Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Expressing fear enhances sensory acquisition.

Susskind, Joshua M, Lee, Daniel H, Cusi, Andrée, Feiman, Roman, Grabski, Wojtek, Anderson, Adam K·2008·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

It has been proposed that facial expression production originates in sensory regulation. Here we demonstrate that facial expressions of fear are configured to enhance sensory acquisition. A statistical model of expression appearance revealed that fear and disgust expressions have opposite shape and surface reflectance features. We hypothesized that this reflects a fundamental antagonism serving to augment versus diminish sensory exposure. In keeping with this hypothesis, when subjects posed expressions of fear, they had a subjectively larger visual field, faster eye movements during target localization and an increase in nasal volume and air velocity during inspiration. The opposite pattern was found for disgust. Fear may therefore work to enhance perception, whereas disgust dampens it. These convergent results provide support for the Darwinian hypothesis that facial expressions are not arbitrary configurations for social communication, but rather, expressions may have originated in altering the sensory interface with the physical world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2138

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Facial expressions of fear enhance sensory acquisition, whereas disgust expressions restrict it.

    “Facial expressions of fear enhance sensory acquisition, whereas disgust expressions restrict it.”
  • Facial expressions are not merely arbitrary patterns used for social communication; rather, they may originate from physiological adjustments that regulate sensory access to the physical world.

    “Facial expressions are not merely arbitrary patterns used for social communication; rather, they may originate from physiological adjustments that regulate sensory access to the physical world (Susskind et al., 2008).”
  • In humans, disgust and fear expressions have nearly opposite statistical patterns of facial configuration, giving rise to the suggestion that these facial expressions may oppositely modulate sensory feedback: fear expressions may enhance relevant sensory perception, whereas disgust may suppress relevant sensory perception.

    “In humans, disgust and fear expressions have nearly opposite statistical patterns of facial configuration, giving rise to the suggestion that these facial expressions may oppositely modulate sensory feedback: fear expressions may enhance relevant sensory perception (e.g., eye widening), whereas disgust may suppress relevant sensory perception (Susskind et al., 2008).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Susskind et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Susskind, J. M., Lee, D. H., Cusi, A., Feiman, R., Grabski, W., & Anderson, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Susskind, Joshua M
  • Anderson, Adam K
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2008-06-15
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
843-850
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2012563519
Cited by
595
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 29
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canada Research Chairs
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
facial expressions, fear, disgust, visual field, eye movements, nasal cavity volume, air velocity, facial expression production, sensory regulation, surface reflectance, perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Inhalation, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nose, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perception, Photic Stimulation, Psychophysics, Sensation, Sleep, REM, Visual Fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review