Cited by 536Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Emergence of Individuality in Genetically Identical Mice

Open access
Freund, Julia, Brandmaier, Andreas M., Lewejohann, Lars, Kirste, Imke, Kritzler, Mareike, Krüger, Antonio, Sachser, Norbert, Lindenberger, Ulman +1 more·2013·Science

Abstract

Identical and Still Different: Even in monozygotic twins reared together, there are always observable differences reflecting the influence of individual responses. Freund et al. (p. 756 ; see the Perspective by Bergmann and Frisén ) developed an inbred mouse model for studying the environmental influences on genetically identical animals and examined their effects on behavioral and neural development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1235294

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study with genetically identical mice found that small early differences in roaming activity became self-reinforcing, compounding over time into large differences in behavior and brain structure.

    “A continuity between humans and lower animals is suggested by a study with genetically identical mice in which small early differences in roaming activity became self-reinforcing, compounding over time into large differences in behavior and brain structure”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Freund et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freund, J., Brandmaier, A. M., Lewejohann, L., Kirste, I., Kritzler, M., Krüger, A., Sachser, N., Lindenberger, U., & Kempermann, G.
Affiliations
  • Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
  • University of Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Freund, Julia
  • Brandmaier, Andreas M.
  • Kempermann, Gerd
Venue
Science
Published
2013-05-10
Volume
340
Issue
6133
Pages
756-759
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2053065690
Cited by
536
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 18
FWCI
15.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • National Institutes of Health (AI51794, U19 AI51794)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19 AI 51794, AI 51794)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
individual differences, neuroplasticity, inbred mouse strains, exploratory activity, hippocampal neurogenesis, environmental enrichment, aging, nonshared environment, behavioral genetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Body Weight, Brain, Female, Hippocampus, Individuality, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred Strains, Neuronal Plasticity, Organ Size, Models, Animal, Mice, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review