Cited by 109Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Mechanism for Age-Related Memory Loss: The Histone-Binding Protein RbAp48

Open access

Abstract

A histone-binding protein that declines with age in the human dentate gyrus can reverse age-related memory deficits in mice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006373

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1038/nrn3085 · DOI
  2. 10.1212/WNL.58.12.1791 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/0197-4580(93)90113-P · DOI
  4. 10.1002/1531-8249(199904)45:4<466::AID-ANA8>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  5. 10.1002/nbm.1022 · DOI
  6. 10.1001/archneur.64.10.1467 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.0400285101 · DOI
  8. 10.1101/lm.1315109 · DOI
  9. Yassa M. A., Lacy J. W., Stark S. M., Albert M. S., Gallagher M., Stark C. E., Pattern separation deficits associated with increased hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus activity in nondemented older adults. Hippocampus 21, 968–979 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1101/lm.1768110 · DOI
  11. Brickman A. M., Stern Y., Small S. A., Hippocampal subregions differentially associate with standardized memory tests. Hippocampus 21, 923–928 (2011). · DOI
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4006-05.2005 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/ana.20667 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1128/MCB.20.14.4970-4978.2000 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.05.021 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0296-07.2007 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03562-X · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.12.019 · DOI
  20. 10.1128/MCB.19.9.5847 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.274.5293.1678 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/geronb/50B.3.P171 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0882-7974.7.2.299 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/science.7618082 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0197-4580(88)80103-9 · DOI
  26. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-10-03568.1989 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0531-5565(02)00160-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.056 · DOI
  29. 10.1210/jc.2006-2199 · DOI
  30. 10.1074/jbc.M702195200 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/297681a0 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3282d28f83 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1007/s11357-006-9015-7 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199901)9:1<44::AID-JMRI6>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/npp.2009.58 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.2174/156720506779025161 · DOI
  37. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4737-10.2011 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.07.002 · DOI
  39. 10.1073/pnas.0806883105 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5280 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80958-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–109 of 109

Metadata

Authors
Pavlopoulos, E., Jones, S., Kosmidis, S., Close, M., Kim, C., Kovalerchik, O., Small, S. A., & Kandel, E. R.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Jones, Sidonie
  • Kosmidis, Stylianos
  • Small, Scott A.
  • Kandel, Eric R.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2013-08-28
Volume
5
Issue
200
Pages
200ra115-200ra115
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2104064321
Cited by
109
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 5
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG034618, R01AG025161, P50AG008702)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
age-related memory decline, RbAp48, histone-binding proteins, histone acetylation, dentate gyrus, hippocampus, cognitive aging, Alzheimer's disease, gene expression profiling, hippocampal-dependent memory, entorhinal cortex, novel object recognition, Morris water maze
MeSH terms
Acetylation, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Animals, Female, Genes, Dominant, Histones, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Organ Specificity, Phosphoproteins, Protein Binding, RNA, Messenger, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Dentate Gyrus, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Mice, Histone Acetyltransferases, Retinoblastoma-Binding Protein 4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review