Cited by 61Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal and yeast genetics research

Rapid Detection of FKS -Associated Echinocandin Resistance in Candida glabrata

Open access
Zhao, Yanan, Nagasaki, Yoji, Kordalewska, Milena, Press, Ellen G., Shields, Ryan K., Nguyen, M. Hong, Clancy, Cornelius J., Perlin, David S.·2016·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

A novel and highly accurate diagnostic assay platform was established for rapid identification of FKS mutations associated with echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata . The assay platform uses allele-specific molecular beacon and DNA melt analysis following asymmetric PCR. A dual assay for FKS1 and FKS2 was developed to identify within 3 h the most common and clinically relevant resistance-associated mutations, including 8 FKS1 HS1 (wild type [WT], S629P, F625S, D632Y, D632E [T1896G], D632E [T1896A], I634V, and F625F) and 7 FKS2 HS1 (WT, F659del, F659S, F659V, F659L, S663P, and S663F) genotypes. A blinded panel of 188 C. glabrata clinical isolates was tested by both assays. The molecular diagnostic results from the dual assay were 100% concordant with data obtained from DNA sequencing. This platform has the potential to overcome the deficiencies of existing in vitro susceptibility-based assays to identify echinocandin-resistant C. glabrata and holds promise as a surrogate diagnostic method to better direct echinocandin therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.01574-16

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]CLSI. 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Document M27-A3. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Y., Nagasaki, Y., Kordalewska, M., Press, E. G., Shields, R. K., Nguyen, M. H., Clancy, C. J., & Perlin, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers Health (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2016-11
Volume
60
Issue
11
Pages
6573-6577
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2507370632
Cited by
61
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (R01AI109025, K08AI114883)
  • Merck (53563)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Candida glabrata, echinocandin resistance, FKS1, FKS2, molecular beacons, asymmetric PCR, rapid diagnostic tests, antifungal resistance, clinical isolates, echinocandin therapy
MeSH terms
Alleles, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, DNA, Fungal, Fungal Proteins, Glucosyltransferases, Humans, Isoenzymes, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mutation, Nucleic Acid Denaturation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Molecular Probes, Gene Expression, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Candida glabrata, Echinocandins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review