Cited by 145Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Echinocandins in antifungal pharmacotherapy

Patil, Akash, Majumdar, Soumyajit·2017·Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Abstract

Objectives: Echinocandins are the newest addition of the last decade to the antifungal armamentarium, which, owing to their unique mechanism of action, selectively target the fungal cells without affecting mammalian cells. Since the time of their introduction, they have come to occupy an important niche in the antifungal pharmacotherapy, due to their efficacy, safety, tolerability and favourable pharmacokinetic profiles. This review deals with the varying facets of echinocandins such as their chemistry, in-vitro and in-vivo evaluations, clinical utility and indications, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and pharmacoeconomic considerations. Key findings: Clinical studies have demonstrated that the echinocandins – caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin – are equivalent, if not superior, to the mainstay antifungal therapies involving amphotericin B and fluconazole. Moreover, echinocandin regimen has been shown to be more cost-effective and economical. Hence, the echinocandins have found favour in the management of invasive systemic fungal infections. Conclusions: The subtle differences in echinocandins with respect to their pharmacology, clinical therapy and the mechanisms of resistance are emerging at a rapid pace from the current pool of research which could potentially aid in extending their utility in the fungal infections of the eye, heart and nervous system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jphp.12780

Cites

231 of 231 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Echinocandins were the first systemic antifungals that targeted the cell wall by disrupting glucan production.

    “Echinocandins were the first systemic antifungals that targeted the cell wall by disrupting the production of glucans (Patil and Majumdar, 2017).”

    From Fungal Cell Wall: Emerging Antifungals and Drug Resistance. (2019) · cites this paper as Patil and Majumdar, 2017

  • Antifungals targeting cell wall production are more selective and less toxic than azole derivatives and amphotericin B.

    “Since human cells do not have a covering wall, antifungals that target the production of cell wall components are more selective and less toxic when compared to azole derivatives and amphotericin B (Patil and Majumdar, 2017).”

    From Fungal Cell Wall: Emerging Antifungals and Drug Resistance. (2019) · cites this paper as Patil and Majumdar, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patil, A., & Majumdar, S.
Affiliations
University of Mississippi (US)
Corresponding author
Majumdar, Soumyajit
Venue
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Published
2017-12-01
Volume
69
Issue
12
Pages
1635-1660
ISSN
  • 0022-3573 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7158
OpenAlex
W2739195081
Cited by
145
References
231
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
echinocandins, caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, antifungal agents, invasive fungal infections, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, cost-effectiveness, antifungal resistance, amphotericin B, fluconazole, fungal eye infection, central nervous system fungal infection
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Micafungin, Anidulafungin, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Humans, Mycoses, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review