Cited by 250Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Correlation of MIC with Outcome for Candida Species Tested against Caspofungin, Anidulafungin, and Micafungin: Analysis and Proposal for Interpretive MIC Breakpoints

Open access
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Rex, J. H., Alexander, B. D., Andes, D., Brown, S. D., Chaturvedi, V. +4 more·2008·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

The CLSI Antifungal Subcommittee followed the M23-A2 “blueprint” to develop interpretive MIC breakpoints for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin against Candida species. MICs of ≤2 μg/ml for all three echinocandins encompass 98.8 to 100% of all clinical isolates of Candida spp. without bisecting any species group and represent a concentration that is easily maintained throughout the dosing period. Data from phase III clinical trials demonstrate that the standard dosing regimens for each of these agents may be used to treat infections due to Candida spp. for which MICs are as high as 2 μg/ml. An MIC predictive of resistance to these agents cannot be defined based on the data from clinical trials due to the paucity of isolates for which MICs exceed 2 μg/ml. The clinical data set included only three isolates from patients treated with an echinocandin (caspofungin) for which the MICs were >2 μg/ml (two C. parapsilosis isolates at 4 μg/ml and one C. rugosa isolate at 8 μg/ml). Based on these data, the CLSI subcommittee has decided to recommend a “susceptible only” breakpoint MIC of ≤2 μg/ml due to the lack of echinocandin resistance in the population of Candida isolates thus far. Isolates for which MICs exceed 2 μg/ml should be designated “nonsusceptible” (NS). For strains yielding results suggestive of an NS category, the organism identification and antimicrobial-susceptibility test results should be confirmed. Subsequently, the isolates should be submitted to a reference laboratory that will confirm the results by using a CLSI reference dilution method.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.00566-08

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical trial data with all 3 echinocandins have shown that the available drugs can be used successfully to treat C. parapsilosis infections with increased MICs.

    “Clinical trial data with all 3 echinocandins have shown that the available drugs can be used successfully to treat C parapsilosis infections with increased MICs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [13]Daneman, N., A. K. Chan, R. Rennie, et al. 2006. The emergence of caspofungin resistance during treatment of recurrent Candida glabrata candidemia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12(Suppl. 4)386. [Google Scholar]
  2. [14]Deresinski, C. C., and D. S. Stevens. 2003. Caspofungin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 361445-1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [17]Dodgson, K. J., A. R. Dodgson, C. Pujol, et al. 2005. Caspofungin resistant C. glabrata. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11(Suppl. 2)364. [Google Scholar]
  4. [58]Rogers, T. R., E. M. Johnson, and C. Munro. 2007. Echinocandidin antifungal drug resistance. J. Invasive Fungal Infect. 199-105. [Google Scholar]
  5. [62]Villareal, N. C., A. W. Fothergill, C. Kelly, et al. 2004. Candida glabrata resistance to caspofungin during therapy, Abstr. M-1034, p. 417. Abstr. 44th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Rex, J. H., Alexander, B. D., Andes, D., Brown, S. D., Chaturvedi, V., Ghannoum, M. A., Knapp, C. C., Sheehan, D. J., & Walsh, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of Texas, Houston, Texas
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • The Clinical Microbiology Institute, Wilsonville, Oregon
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Trek Diagnostic Systems, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Pfaller, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2008-08
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
2620-2629
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2100967944
Cited by
250
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
29.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida, echinocandins, caspofungin, anidulafungin, micafungin, antifungal susceptibility, Candida parapsilosis, Candida rugosa, antifungal resistance
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Micafungin, Anidulafungin, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Lipoproteins, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Statistics as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review