Cited by 121Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsOcular and Laser Science ResearchOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome

Age related macular degeneration and sun exposure, iris colour, and skin sensitivity to sunlight

Open access
Khan, J C·2006·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: It has been suggested that sun exposure may be a risk factor for age related macular degeneration (AMD) and that skin sensitivity to sunlight and iris colour could be confounding factors. The aim was to investigate this further in the white population. METHODS: 446 cases with end stage AMD were compared with 283 spouse controls. Data on sun exposure, places of residence, iris colour, subjective assessment of change in iris colour, hair colour at age 20, and skin sensitivity were obtained using a questionnaire. Iris colour was graded clinically by comparison with standard photographs. AMD was graded using stereoscopic colour fundus photographs as well as clinical examination and was defined as the presence of geographic atrophy or choroidal neovascularisation. All variables were included in a multiple logistic regression model including age, sex, and smoking. RESULTS: There was no association between AMD and sun exposure or related factors except for the suggestion of an association between sunburn prone skin type and geographic atrophy which reached borderline significance. CONCLUSIONS: No significant association between AMD and sun exposure, iris colour, change in iris colour, or hair colour was demonstrated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.2005.073825

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khan, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Khan, J C
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
29-32
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063427349
Cited by
121
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular and Laser Science Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, sun exposure, iris color, geographic atrophy, choroidal neovascularization, hair color, confounding factors, Caucasian population
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disease Susceptibility, Eye Color, Female, Hair Color, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Skin, Skin Pigmentation, Smoking, Sunburn, Sunlight, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review