Cited by 237Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressNutritional Studies and Diet

Lutein and zeaxanthin intake and the risk of age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Ma, Le, Dou, Hong-Liang, Wu, Yi-Qun, Huang, Yang-Mu, Huang, Yu-Bei, Xu, Xian-Rong, Zou, Zhi-Yong, Lin, Xiao-Ming·2012·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Lutein and zeaxanthin are thought to decrease the incidence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD); however, findings have been inconsistent. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin and AMD risk. Relevant studies were identified by searching five databases up to April 2010. Reference lists of articles were retrieved, and experts were contacted. Literature search, data extraction and study quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers and results were pooled quantitatively using meta-analysis methods. The potential sources of heterogeneity and publication bias were also estimated. The search yielded six longitudinal cohort studies. The pooled relative risk (RR) for early AMD, comparing the highest with the lowest category of lutein and zeaxanthin intake, was 0·96 (95 % CI 0·78, 1·17). Dietary intake of these carotenoids was significantly related with a reduction in risk of late AMD (RR 0·74; 95 % CI 0·57, 0·97); and a statistically significant inverse association was observed between lutein and zeaxanthin intake and neovascular AMD risk (RR 0·68; 95 % CI 0·51, 0·92). The results were essentially consistent among subgroups stratified by participant characteristics. The findings of the present meta-analysis indicate that dietary lutein and zeaxanthin is not significantly associated with a reduced risk of early AMD, whereas an increase in the intake of these carotenoids may be protective against late AMD. However, additional studies are needed to confirm these relationships.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114511004260

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intake of the carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin, but not beta-carotene, showed a lower risk of developing age-related macular degeneration.

    “Recent studies have reported that intake of carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin, but not β-carotene, showed a lower risk of developing this illness [257,258].”

    From Vitamin A Update: Forms, Sources, Kinetics, Detection, Function, Deficiency, Therapeutic Use and Toxicity (2021) · cites this paper as [257]

    The Abstract and Discussion report that higher lutein and zeaxanthin intake was associated with lower risk of late and neovascular AMD, but not significantly with lower risk of early AMD. The paper does not establish the claimed contrast with β-carotene (searched: β-carotene, beta-carotene, b-carotene). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, L., Dou, H.-L., Wu, Y.-Q., Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-B., Xu, X.-R., Zou, Z.-Y., & Lin, X.-M.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lin, Xiao-Ming
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2011-09-08
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
350-359
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W1972454552
Cited by
237
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
lutein, zeaxanthin, age-related macular degeneration, dietary carotenoids, neovascular AMD, late AMD, early AMD, dietary intake
MeSH terms
Aged, Diet, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Middle Aged, Risk, Lutein, Age of Onset, Evidence-Based Medicine, Xanthophylls, Wet Macular Degeneration, Zeaxanthins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review