Cited by 161Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome

Case-control study of the risk factors for age related macular degeneration

Open access
Chaine, G., Hullo, A., Sahel, J., Soubrane, G., Espinasse-Berrod, M.-A, Schutz, D., Bourguignon, C., Harpey, C. +4 more·1998·British Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

AIM: A case-control study was initiated to determine the risk factors for the development of age related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Study participants, who were all white, aged 50-85 years, and were recruited from private ophthalmology practices. Each practitioner enrolled patients with bilateral AMD, who were then matched with controls for sex and age. Environmental factors and systemic and ocular histories were screened. All patients had bilateral red-free fundus photographs and fluorescein angiography. Photographs were classified into pigment epithelium alterations, drusen, geographic atrophy, and exudative AMD. Statistical analysis included the identification of risk factors for AMD. A multivariate analysis was performed at the end of the study. Analysis included the entire study population and was carried out for each stage of AMD. RESULTS: 1844 controls were compared with 1844 patients with AMD. Mean age was 71 years for controls and 72 for cases. Logistic regression identified six major risk factors for AMD (whole population): arterial hypertension (odds ratio (OR) = 1.28), coronary disease (OR = 1.31), hyperopia (OR = 1.33), light coloured irises (OR = 1.22), and lens opacities or previous cataract surgery (OR = 1.55). The significance of vascular risk factors was increased for late stages of AMD, especially the atrophic forms (coronary disease, OR = 3.19). CONCLUSIONS: This large case-control study confirms some of the risk factors previously identified and may contribute to the determination of methods for prevention of AMD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjo.82.9.996

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only one epidemiological study failed to find an association between smoking and age-related macular degeneration.

    “Only one epidemiological study failed to find an association between smoking and age-related macular degeneration.40”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [40]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Sarks S, Sarks J. Age-related macular degeneration: atrophic form. In: Ryan SJ, ed. Retina. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1994:1071-102.
  2. Soubrane G, Coscas G, Français C, et al. Occult subretinal neovessels in age-related macular history: natural history and early laser treatment. Ophthalmology 1990;97:647-9.
  3. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Subfoveal neovas- cular lesions in age-related macular degeneration: guide- lines for evaluation and treatment in the Macular Photoco- agulation Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1242-57.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaine, G., Hullo, A., Sahel, J., Soubrane, G., Espinasse-Berrod, M.-A., Schutz, D., Bourguignon, C., Harpey, C., Brault, Y., Coste, M., Moccatti, D., & Bourgeois, H.
Affiliations
Hôpital Lyon Sud (FR)
Venue
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
82
Issue
9
Pages
996-1002
ISSN
0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045906508
Cited by
161
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, risk factors, hypertension, coronary disease, hyperopia, lens opacity, cataract surgery, geographic atrophy, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, vascular risk factors, AMD prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Cataract, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Hyperopia, Hypertension, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Pigment Epithelium of Eye, Risk Factors, Smoking, Retinal Drusen, Multivariate Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review