Cited by 459Nerve injury and regenerationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 151 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuronal Intrinsic Mechanisms of Axon Regeneration

Liu, Kai, Tedeschi, Andrea, Park, Kevin Kyungsuk, He, Zhigang·2011·Annual Review of Neuroscience

Abstract

Failure of axon regeneration after central nervous system (CNS) injuries results in permanent functional deficits. Numerous studies in the past suggested that blocking extracellular inhibitory influences alone is insufficient to allow the majority of injured axons to regenerate, pointing to the importance of revisiting the hypothesis that diminished intrinsic regenerative ability critically underlies regeneration failure. Recent studies in different species and using different injury models have started to reveal important cellular and molecular mechanisms within neurons that govern axon regeneration. This review summarizes these observations and discusses possible strategies for stimulating axon regeneration and perhaps functional recovery after CNS injury.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113723

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 151 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fishman HM, 2003, News Physiol. Sci., 18, 115
  2. Lasek RJ, Hoffman PN. 1976. The neuronal cytoskeleton, axonal transport and axonal growth. In Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Conference on Cell Proliferation, Cell Motility. Vol. 3, ed. R Goldman, T Pollard, J Rosenbaum, pp. 1021–49. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press
  3. Nakazawa T, 2002, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 43, 3319

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, K., Tedeschi, A., Park, K. K., & He, Z.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Published
2011-07-21
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
131-152
ISSN
  • 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4126
OpenAlex
W2141003407
Cited by
458
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 40
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
axon regeneration, central nervous system injury, functional recovery
MeSH terms
Cyclic AMP, Animals, Axons, Axonal Transport, Central Nervous System Diseases, Humans, Inflammation, Models, Neurological, Nerve Regeneration, Neurons, Cytokines, Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review