Cited by 2,486Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorStress and Burnout ResearchWorkaholism, burnout, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Burnout and work engagement: the JD–R approach.

Open access
Bakker, Arnold B., Demerouti, Evangelia, Sanz-Vergel, Ana Isabel·2014·Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Abstract

Whereas burnout refers to a state of exhaustion and cynicism toward work, engagement is defined as a positive motivational state of vigor, dedication, and absorption. In this article, we discuss the main definitions and conceptualizations of both concepts used in the literature. In addition, we review the most important antecedents of burnout and work engagement by examining situational and individual predictors. We also review the possible consequences of burnout and engagement and integrate the research findings using job demands–resources theory. Although both burnout and work engagement are related to important job-related outcomes, burnout seems to be more strongly related to health outcomes, whereas work engagement is more strongly related to motivational outcomes. We discuss daily and momentary fluctuations in burnout and work engagement as possibilities for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 130 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1214 · DOI
  2. Cole MS, 2012, J. Manag., 38, 1550
  3. Costa PT, 1992, NEO PI-R Professional Manual
  4. Demerouti E, 2006, Occupational Health Psychology: European Perspectives on Research, Education, and Practice, 1, 83
  5. Dimotakis N, 2013, A Day in the Life of a Happy Worker, 85
  6. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kant I, 2004, Gedrag Organ., 17, 5
  8. Längle A, 2003, Eur. Psychother., 4, 107
  9. Linley PA, 2006, Psychologist, 19, 86
  10. Maslach C, 1984, J. Health Hum. Resour. Adm., 7, 189
  11. Pick D, 1991, Can. J. Nurs. Res., 23, 33
  12. Schaufeli WB, 1996, MBI Manual, 19
  13. Schaufeli WB, 2001, Psycholoog, 36, 422
  14. Schaufeli WB, 2006, Gedrag Organ., 19, 323
  15. Shirom A, 2005, Int. Rev. Ind. Organ. Psychol., 20, 269
  16. 10.5465/amr.2001.4378011 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I.
Affiliations
  • Lingnan University (HK)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • Biological and Health Psychology Department, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain
Venue
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
Published
2014-03-21
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
389-411
ISSN
  • 2327-0608 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-0616
OpenAlex
W2125379373
Cited by
2,486
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 272 · 2025: 322 · 2024: 284 · 2023: 315 · 2022: 299 · 2021: 255 · 2020: 202 · 2019: 156 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 15
FWCI
22.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
Keywords
burnout, work engagement, job demands-resources model, job demands, job resources, antecedents of work engagement, burnout consequences, health outcomes, daily fluctuations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review