The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TEAMS IN ORGANIZATIONS: Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness
Abstract
▪ Abstract This review examines recent research on groups and teams, giving special emphasis to research investigating factors that influence the effectiveness of teams at work in organizations. Several performance-relevant factors are considered, including group composition, cohesiveness, and motivation, although certain topics (e.g. composition) have been more actively researched than others in recent years and so are addressed in greater depth. Also actively researched are certain types of teams, including flight crews, computer-supported groups, and various forms of autonomous work groups. Evidence on basic processes in and the performance effectiveness of such groups is reviewed. Also reviewed are findings from studies of organizational redesign involving the implementation of teams. Findings from these studies provide some of the strongest support for the value of teams to organizational effectiveness. The review concludes by briefly considering selected open questions and emerging directions in group research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Group Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1991) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496491222002 · Cited by 535
Cited by
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
Torraco, R. J. (2005) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484305278283 · Cited by 3,534
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273
Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930
The science of training: a decade of progress
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471 · Cited by 1,703
What Differences Make a Difference?: The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x · Cited by 1,276
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159571 · Cited by 889
What Do We Know about Health Care Team Effectiveness? A Review of the Literature
Lemieux-Charles, L., & McGuire, W. L. (2006) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558706287003 · Cited by 844
The Collective Construction of Work Group Moods
Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667070 · Cited by 678
Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Cordery, J. L. (2001) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317901167460 · Cited by 617
To your heart's content: a model of affective diversity in top management teams
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667020 · Cited by 599
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.409 · Cited by 595
Homan, A. C., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Knippenberg, D. V., Ilgen, D. R., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.35732995 · Cited by 525
Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Wienk, J. A. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.220 · Cited by 464
Emotional intelligence, leadership effectiveness, and team outcomes
Melita Prati, L., Douglas, C., Ferris, G. R., Ammeter, A. P., & Buckley, M. R. (2003) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028961 · Cited by 462
Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039654 · Cited by 448
How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams
Pirola-Merlo, A., Härtel, C., Mann, L., & Hirst, G. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00144-3 · Cited by 451
A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models: Moving Toward a Dynamic and Temporal Framework
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313503014 · Cited by 408
Communication in virtual teams: a conceptual framework and research agenda
Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., & Salas, E. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.005 · Cited by 291
The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity
Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726708096639 · Cited by 215
Industrial and Organisation Research on Self‐Regulation: From Constructs to Applications
Vancouver, J. B., & Day, D. V. (2005) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00202.x · Cited by 190
Duty orientation: Theoretical development and preliminary construct testing
Hannah, S. T., Jennings, P. L., Bluhm, D., Peng, A. C., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.007 · Cited by 117
The Evolution of the Measurement of Cohesion
Siebold, G. L. (1999) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1101_2 · Cited by 98
The Impact of Cultural Value Diversity on Multicultural Team Performance☆
KIRKMAN, B., & SHAPIRO, D. (2005) · Advances in International Management · doi:10.1016/s0747-7929(05)18002-0 · Cited by 94
Langfred, C. W. (2000) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640003100103 · Cited by 82
Rethinking Virtuality and Its Impact on Teams
Foster, M. K., Abbey, A., Callow, M. A., Zu, X., & Wilbon, A. D. (2015) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496415573795 · Cited by 71
Mikolajczak, M., Balon, N., Ruosi, M., & Kotsou, I. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.001 · Cited by 28
Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)00045-8 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 307-338
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2141579028
- Cited by
- 1,613
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
