The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Commensuration as a Social Process
Abstract
Although it is evident in routine decision-making and a crucial vehicle of rationalization, commensuration as a general social process has been given little consideration by sociologists. This article defines commensuration as the comparison of different entities according to a common metric, notes commensuration's long history as an instrument of social thought, analyzes commensuration as a mode of power, and discusses the cognitive and political stakes inherent in calling something incommensurable. We provide a framework for future empirical study of commensuration and demonstrate how this analytic focus can inform established fields of sociological inquiry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Incommensurability and Valuation in Law
Sunstein, C. R. (1994) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1289693 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation
Tyler, T. R. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038 · Cited by 2,381
Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation
Lamont, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022 · Cited by 1,492
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008) · European Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1017/s0003975609000150 · Cited by 1,265
Self-citationA world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization
Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629 · Cited by 1,226
An introduction to market devices
Muniesa, F., Millo, Y., & Callon, M. (2007) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.2007.00727.x · Cited by 795
Classification Situations: Life- chances in the neoliberal era
Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2013) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2013.11.002 · Cited by 544
Evaluation Practices and Effects of Indicator Use—A Literature Review
Rijcke, S. D., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P., & Hammarfelt, B. (2016) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv038 · Cited by 467
The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies
Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612450120 · Cited by 392
The Invisible Cage: Workers’ Reactivity to Opaque Algorithmic Evaluations
Rahman, H. A. (2021) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392211010118 · Cited by 375
The Economic Sociology of Conventions: Habit, Custom, Practice, and Routine in Market Order
Biggart, N. W., & Beamish, T. D. (2003) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100051 · Cited by 345
Rethinking the Relationship Between Reputation and Legitimacy: A Social Actor Conceptualization
King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/crr.2008.16 · Cited by 343
Odious Comparisons: Incommensurability, the Case Study, and “Small N's” in Sociology
Steinmetz, G. (2004) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00225.x · Cited by 320
Markets, Morals, and Practices of Trade: Jurisdictional Disputes in the U.S. Commerce in Cadavers
Anteby, M. (2010) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.606 · Cited by 261
Misdemeanor Justice: Control without Conviction
Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2013) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/674743 · Cited by 243
How Rankings Produce Competition: The Case of Global University Rankings
Brankovic, J., Ringel, L., & Werron, T. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Soziologie · doi:10.1515/zfsoz-2018-0118 · Cited by 223
Corporate reporting and accounting for externalities
Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., & O’dwyer, B. (2018) · Accounting and Business Research · doi:10.1080/00014788.2018.1470155 · Cited by 220
Pollock, N., & D’Adderio, L. (2012) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2012.06.004 · Cited by 206
Computing the everyday: Social media as data platforms
Alaimo, C., & Kallinikos, J. (2017) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2017.1318327 · Cited by 205
Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2010) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/649437 · Cited by 198
The Contexts of Control: Information, Power, and Truck-Driving Work
Levy, K. E. C. (2015) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2015.998105 · Cited by 171
Waters, F., Chiu, V., Atkinson, A., & Blom, J. D. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00303 · Cited by 165
The Politics of Uncertainty: Challenges of Transformation
Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2020) · doi:10.4324/9781003023845 · Cited by 158
(2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712282.001.0001 · Cited by 138
NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores
Erosheva, E. A., Grant, S., Chen, M.-C., Lindner, M. D., Nakamura, R. K., & Lee, C. J. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz4868 · Cited by 125
Adcroft, A. (2011) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.526096 · Cited by 121
Commensuration Bias in Peer Review
Lee, C. J. (2015) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/683652 · Cited by 90
“Accountability, Quantification, and Law
Espeland, W. N., & Vannebo, B. I. (2007) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105908 · Cited by 78
Self-citationWho games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation
Siler, K., & Larivière, V. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104608 · Cited by 70
Theorizing the Economy of Traces: From Audit Society to Surveillance Capitalism
Power, M. (2022) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877211052296 · Cited by 66
The Pricing of Open Access Journals: Diverse Niches and Sources of Value in Academic Publishing
Siler, K., & Frenken, K. (2020) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00016 · Cited by 64
The Drama of Metrics: Status, Spectacle, and Resistance Among YouTube Drama Creators
Christin, A., & Lewis, R. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305121999660 · Cited by 63
Pasek, A., Vaughan, H., & Starosielski, N. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231158994 · Cited by 61
Quantifying human resource management: a literature review
Coron, C. (2022) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-05-2020-0322 · Cited by 40
“Making Peace with Metrics: Relational Work in Online News Production.”
Christin, A., & Petre, C. (2020) · Sociologica · doi:10.6092/issn.1971-8853/11178 · Cited by 34
Bringing art to market: The diversity of pricing styles in a local art market
O’Neil, K. M. (2008) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2007.12.002 · Cited by 21
Quantification 2.0? Bibliometric Infrastructures in Academic Evaluation
Krüger, A. K. (2020) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v8i2.2575 · Cited by 20
Enabling ‘AI’? The situated production of commensurabilities
Jaton, F., & Sormani, P. (2023) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127231194591 · Cited by 17
Governing teachers’ work and learning through data: Australian insights
Hardy, I. (2019) · Cambridge Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0305764x.2018.1557594 · Cited by 15
Measuring the gender pay gap: The complexity of HR metrics
Coron, C. (2021) · Employee Relations: The International Journal · doi:10.1108/er-07-2020-0316 · Cited by 8
Valuing soccer players: on the valuation dynamics of an online user community
Detzen, D., & Löhlein, L. (2024) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-05-2022-5824 · Cited by 8
Unthinking Capital : Conceptual and Terminological Landmarks
Ascione, G. (2017) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038516658398 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 313-343
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2139799726
- Cited by
- 2,085
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.