CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure

Crouter, Scott E., Clowers, Kurt G., Bassett, David R.·2006·Journal of Applied Physiology
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00818.2005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a new two-regression model relating Actigraph activity counts to energy expenditure over a wide range of physical activities. Forty-eight participants [age 35 yr (11.4)] performed various activities chosen to represent sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous intensities. Eighteen activities were split into three routines with each routine being performed by 20 individuals, for a total of 60 tests. Forty-five tests were randomly selected for the development of the new equation, and 15 tests were used to cross-validate the new equation and compare it against already existing equations. During each routine, the participant wore an Actigraph accelerometer on the hip, and oxygen consumption was simultaneously measured by a portable metabolic system. For each activity, the coefficient of variation (CV) for the counts per 10 s was calculated to determine whether the activity was walking/running or some other activity. If the CV was ≤10, then a walk/run regression equation was used, whereas if the CV was >10, a lifestyle/leisure time physical activity regression was used. In the cross-validation group, the mean estimates using the new algorithm (2-regression model with an inactivity threshold) were within 0.75 metabolic equivalents (METs) of measured METs for each of the activities performed ( P ≥ 0.05), which was a substantial improvement over the single-regression models. The new algorithm is more accurate for the prediction of energy expenditure than currently published regression equations using the Actigraph accelerometer.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00818.2005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's Guidelines For Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.
  2. 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00006 · DOI
  3. 10.1001/jama.1984.03350040017014 · DOI
  4. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520380029031 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000079078.62035.EC · DOI
  6. 10.1097/00005768-199805000-00021 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000132379.09364.F8 · DOI
  9. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.9.981 · DOI
  10. 10.1055/s-2003-37196 · DOI
  11. 10.1055/s-2001-13816 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/02701367.2000.10608878 · DOI
  13. 10.1056/NEJM198603063141003 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1055/s-2003-39504 · DOI
  15. 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00003 · DOI
  16. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048829.75758.A0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Crouter, S. E., Clowers, K. G., & Bassett, D. R.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Published
2006-04
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
1324-1331
ISSN
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
DOI
10.1152/japplphysiol.00818.2005
Cited by
345
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review