Cited by 254Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesTactile and Sensory Interactions

Representation of Umami Taste in the Human Brain

de Araujo, I.E.T., Kringelbach, M. L., Rolls, E. T., Hobden, P.·2003·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Umami taste stimuli, of which an exemplar is monosodium glutamate (MSG) and which capture what is described as the taste of protein, were shown using functional MRI (fMRI) to activate similar cortical regions of the human taste system to those activated by a prototypical taste stimulus, glucose. These taste regions included the insular/opercular cortex and the caudolateral orbitofrontal cortex. A part of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) was also activated. When the nucleotide 0.005 M inosine 5′-monophosphate (IMP) was added to MSG (0.05 M), the blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) signal in an anterior part of the orbitofrontal cortex showed supralinear additivity; this may reflect the subjective enhancement of umami taste that has been described when IMP is added to MSG. These results extend to humans previous studies in macaques showing that single neurons in these taste cortical areas can be tuned to umami stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00669.2002

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the full sensory impact of palatable food, and the subjective feeling of pleasure in humans, taste is integrated with other sensory modalities such as smell and mouth feel in forebrain areas including the amygdala, as well as primary and higher-order sensory cortical areas, including the insular and orbitofrontal cortex, to form sensory representations of particular foods.

    “Clearly, for the full sensory impact of palatable food, and the subjective feeling of pleasure in humans, taste is integrated with other sensory modalities such as smell and mouth feel in forebrain areas including the amygdala, as well as primary and higher-order sensory cortical areas, including the insular and orbitofrontal cortex, to form sensory representations of particular foods ([43](#B43),”

    From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Araujo, I. E. T., Kringelbach, M. L., Rolls, E. T., & Hobden, P.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2003-07
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
313-319
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2132924691
Cited by
254
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
umami taste, monosodium glutamate, inosine 5'-monophosphate, taste cortex, insula, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, taste enhancement, human brain
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Glucose, Humans, Inosine Monophosphate, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Sodium Glutamate, Taste, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review