Cited by 57Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Separate neural systems for behavioral change and for emotional responses to failure during behavioral inhibition

Open access
Deng, Wanlu, Rolls, Edmund T., Ji, Xiaoxi, Robbins, Trevor W., Banaschewski, Tobias, Bokde, Arun L. W., Bromberg, Uli, Buechel, Christian +19 more·2017·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Abstract To analyze the involvement of different brain regions in behavioral inhibition and impulsiveness, differences in activation were investigated in fMRI data from a response inhibition task, the stop‐signal task, in 1709 participants. First, areas activated more in stop‐success (SS) than stop‐failure (SF) included the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) extending into the inferior frontal gyrus (ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, BA 47/12), and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Second, the anterior cingulate and anterior insula (AI) were activated more on failure trials, specifically in SF versus SS. The interaction between brain region and SS versus SF activations was significant ( P = 5.6 * 10 −8 ). The results provide new evidence from this “big data” investigation consistent with the hypotheses that the lateral OFC is involved in the stop‐related processing that inhibits the action; that the DLPFC is involved in attentional processes that influence task performance; and that the AI and anterior cingulate are involved in emotional processes when failure occurs. The investigation thus emphasizes the role of the human lateral OFC BA 47/12 in changing behavior, and inhibiting behavior when necessary. A very similar area in BA47/12 is involved in changing behavior when an expected reward is not obtained, and has been shown to have high functional connectivity in depression. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3527–3537, 2017 . © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.23607

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The human right lateral OFC/inferior frontal gyrus is activated when behavioural correction is required in the stop-signal task.

    “The human right lateral OFC/inferior frontal gyrus is also activated when behavioural correction is required in the stop-signal task (Fig. 4B) (Deng et al., 2017).”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2017

  • Successful stopping in the stop-signal task is associated with high activation of the inferior frontal gyrus and lateral orbitofrontal cortex.

    “successful stopping in the stop-signal task is associated with high activation of the inferior frontal gyrus and lateral OFC (Deng et al., 2017).”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Deng et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deng, W., Rolls, E. T., Ji, X., Robbins, T. W., Banaschewski, T., Bokde, A. L. W., Bromberg, U., Buechel, C., Desrivières, S., Conrod, P., Flor, H., Frouin, V., Gallinat, J., Garavan, H., Gowland, P., Heinz, A., Ittermann, B., Martinot, J., Lemaitre, H., Nees, F., Papadopoulos Orfanos, D., Poustka, L., Smolka, M. N., Walter, H., Whelan, R., Schumann, G., & Feng, J.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University Medical Centre Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg 20246 Germany
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
  • Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, INSERM Unit 1000 “Neuroimaging & Psychiatry”, University Paris Sud, University Paris Descartes‐Sorbonne Paris Cité Paris France
  • Neurospin, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, CEA‐Saclay Center Paris France
  • Neuroimaging Center (DE)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Medical Research Council‐Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Feng, Jianfeng
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04-21
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
3527-3537
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2605763473
Cited by
57
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC No. 91630314)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
behavioral inhibition, response inhibition, stop-signal task, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, impulsivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review