Cited by 103Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

How “reversible” is telomeric aging?

Epel, Elissa·2012·Cancer Prevention Research

Abstract

A critical question in human health is the malleability of telomere length. Telomere length, sampled at one point during adult life, is predictive of certain types of cancer and other immune and metabolic-related diseases. We now know from basic studies that the telomere/telomerase maintenance system plays a causal role in accelerating biologic aging and promoting disease processes. One can develop short telomeres for a multitude of reasons. Historical factors such as genetics, prenatal conditions, and early adversity, contribute to adult telomere length; however, current stress and lifestyle are also associated. If these modifiable predictors are causal factors in telomere shortening, there is a tremendous opportunity to improve maintenance and possibly even lengthen telomeres with behavioral interventions. This minireview discusses our current understanding of telomere lengthening and questions facing the field. Several small-scale stress reduction/wellness studies show promising findings, suggesting that cell aging can be slowed or reversed in vivo over short periods. Moreover, possible mechanisms are discussed, that take into account actual telomeric lengthening, such as that which occurs through telomerase-mediated elongation, or mechanisms resulting in "pseudo-telomeric lengthening" as might occur from changes in cell type distribution. There is a strong need for more translational clinical to bench research to address mechanistic questions in experimental models. In addition, well-designed intervention research that examines both telomeres and potential mediators of change can further enhance our understanding of malleability, mechanism, and clinical implications of telomere lengthening. Cancer Prev Res; 5(10); 1163-8. ©2012 AACR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-12-0370

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some individuals maintain and may even lengthen average LTL for some periods.

    “Some individuals maintain and may even lengthen average LTL for some periods (Epel, 2012; Muezzinler et al., 2013).”
  • Relatively long telomeres tend to shorten over time, and relatively short telomeres tend to lengthen over time, possibly due to preferential recruitment of reparative mechanisms such as telomerase activity.

    “The reasons for this are unknown, but relatively long telomeres tend to shorten over time, and relatively short telomeres tend to lengthen over time, possibly due to the preferential recruitment of reparative mechanisms such as telomerase activity (TA) (Epel, 2012).”
  • Important caveats in interpreting LTL include distinguishing between telomere shortening in the individual leukocyte and apparent telomere shortening when examining average LTL due to redistribution of leukocyte cell types having different telomere lengths.

    “Important caveats must be considered in interpreting LTL (Aviv et al., 2006; Epel, 2012), e.g., (a) distinguishing between telomere shortening in the individual leukocyte vs. “apparent” telomere shortening when examining average LTL, due to a re-distribution of leukocyte cell types having different telomere lengths, such as naïve vs. memory T cells;”
  • Several studies reported dose-response relationships, with greater improvement in mental well-being or sense of purpose in life or greater adherence to the behavioral intervention associating with larger increases in PBMC basal TA.

    “Nonetheless, several studies reported “dose-response” relationships, with greater improvement in mental well-being or sense of purpose in life or greater adherence to the behavioral intervention, associating with larger increases in PBMC basal TA (Epel, 2012; Jacobs et al., 2011).”
  • These studies have generally found intervention-associated increases in PBMC basal TA.

    “These studies have generally found intervention-associated increases in PBMC basal TA (Epel, 2012; Epel et al., 2009b; Epel, 2009; Jacobs et al., 2011; Lengacher et al., 2014; Ornish et al., 2008; Schutte and Malouff, 2014b; Starkweather et al., 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Epel, E.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Epel, Elissa
Venue
Cancer Prevention Research
Published
2012-10-01
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
1163-1168
ISSN
  • 1940-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6215
OpenAlex
W2099763564
Cited by
103
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Prevention Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG030424)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
telomere length, telomere elongation, telomerase, biological aging, telomere shortening, stress reduction, lifestyle intervention, cell type distribution, cancer risk, modifiable risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Humans, Telomere Homeostasis, Telomere Shortening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review