Cited by 143Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHealth, psychology, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction to Prevent Flare-Up in Patients with Inactive Ulcerative Colitis

Open access

Abstract

Background/Aims: The primary therapeutic goals in ulcerative colitis (UC) are to maintain excellent quality of life (QOL) by treating flare-ups when they occur, and preventing flare-ups. Since stress can trigger UC flare-ups, we investigated the efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) to reduce flare-ups and improve QOL. Methods: Patients with moderately severe UC, in remission, were randomized to MBSR or time/attention control. Primary outcome was disease status. Secondary outcomes were changes in markers of inflammation and disease activity, markers of stress and psychological assessments. Results: 55 subjects were randomized. Absence of flares, time to flare and severity of flare over 1 year were similar between the two groups. However, post hoc analysis showed that MBSR decreased the proportion of participants with at least one flare-up among those with top tertile urinary cortisol and baseline perceived stress (30 vs. 70%; p < 0.001). MBSR patients who flared demonstrated significantly lower stress at the last visit compared to flared patients in the control group (p = 0.04). Furthermore, MBSR prevented a drop in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire during flare (p < 0.01). Conclusion: MBSR did not affect the rate or severity of flare-ups in UC patients in remission. However, MBSR might be effective for those with high stress reactivity (high perceived stress and urinary cortisol) during remission. MBSR appears to improve QOL in UC patients by minimizing the negative impact of flare-ups on QOL. Further studies are needed to identify a subset of patients for whom MBSR could alter disease course.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000356316

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jedel, S., Hoffman, A., Merriman, P., Swanson, B., Voigt, R., Rajan, K. B., Shaikh, M., Li, H., & Keshavarzian, A.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US)
  • Rush University (US)
Venue
Digestion
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2014
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
142-155
ISSN
  • 0012-2823 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9867
OpenAlex
W1485424371
Cited by
143
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digestion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R21AT003939)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, ulcerative colitis, flare prevention, remission, perceived stress, urinary cortisol, stress reactivity, psychological intervention, inflammatory markers
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, C-Reactive Protein, Colitis, Ulcerative, Double-Blind Method, Feces, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Interleukins, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Disease Progression, Disease-Free Survival, Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review